Why Do You Like To Drive Automated? A Context-Dependent Analysis of Highly Automated Driving to Elaborate Requirements for Intelligent User Interfaces
Authors
Technology acceptance is a critical factor influencing the adoption of automated vehicles. Consequently, manufacturers feel obliged to design automated driving systems in a way to account for negative effects of automation on user experience. Recent publications confirm that full automation will potentially lack in the satisfaction of important user needs. To counteract, the adoption of Intelligent User Interfaces (IUIs) could play an important role. In this work, we focus on the evaluation of the impact of scenario type (represented by variations of road type and traffic volume) on the fulfillment of psychological needs. Results of a qualitative study (N=30) show that the scenario has a high impact on how users perceive the automation. Based on this, we discuss the potential of adaptive IUIs in the context of automated driving. In detail, we look at the aspects trust, acceptance, and user experience and its impact on IUIs in different driving situations.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Calibration of Trust Expectancies in Conditionally Automated Driving by Brand, Reliability Information and Introductionary Videos: An Online Study
AutoUI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Mode Awareness Interfaces in Automated Vehicles, Robotics, and Aviation: A Literature Review
AutoUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Designing Adaptive AV Interfaces: Linking Acceptance Profiles to Design Preferences for Enhanced Adoption
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Socially Adaptive Autonomous Vehicles: Effects of Contingent Driving Behavior on Drivers' Experiences
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving
CHI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' Suggestions
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 75%
What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data
CHI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)