Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems
Honorable MentionAuthors
Autonomous vehicle system performance is limited by uncertainties inherent in the driving environment and challenges in processing sensor data. Engineers thus face the design decision of biasing systems toward lower sensitivity to potential threats (more misses) or higher sensitivity (more false alarms). We explored this problem for Automatic Emergency Braking systems in Level 3 autonomous vehicles, where the driver is required to monitor the system for failures. Participants (N=48) drove through a simulated suburban environment and experienced detection misses, perfect performance, or false alarms. We found that driver vigilance was greater for less-sensitive braking systems, resulting in improved performance during a potentially fatal failure. In addition, regardless of system bias, greater levels of autonomy resulted in significantly worse driver performance. Our results demonstrate that accounting for the effects of system bias on driver vigilance and performance will be critical design considerations as vehicle autonomy levels increase.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data
CHI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
All-inclusive TORs: Cross-Cultural and Age-Sensitive Design for Take-Over Requests in Level 3 Cars
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
Improving Take-Over Quality in Automated Driving By Interrupting Non-Driving Tasks
IUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
The Real T(h)OR: Evaluation of Emergency Take-Over on a Test Track
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
No Risk No Trust: Investigating Perceived Risk in Highly Automated Driving
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
Who Has The Right of Way, Automated Vehicles or Drivers? Multiple Perspectives in Safety, Negotiation and Trust
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 100%
Need for Trust Calibration in Takeover request Performance in Level 3 Automated vehicles
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
Human-Machine Interaction for Vehicles: Review and Outlook
CHI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 75%
VR-OOM: Virtual Reality On-rOad driving siMulation
CHI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)