Socially Adaptive Autonomous Vehicles: Effects of Contingent Driving Behavior on Drivers' Experiences
Authors
Social scientists have argued that autonomous vehicles (AVs) need to act as effective social agents; they have to respond implicitly to other drivers' behaviors as human drivers would. In this paper, we investigate how contingent driving behavior in AVs influences human drivers' experiences. We compared three algorithmic driving models: one trained on human driving data that responds to interactions (a familiar contingent behavior) and two artificial models that intend to either always-yield or never-yield regardless of how the interaction unfolds (non-contingent behaviors). Results show that a familiar contingent behavior significantly reduces drivers' hesitance and stress when interacting with AVs. The direct relationship between familiar contingency and positive experience indicates that AVs should incorporate socially familiar driving patterns through contextually-adaptive algorithms to improve the chances of successful deployment and acceptance in mixed human-AV traffic environments.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Why Do You Like To Drive Automated? A Context-Dependent Analysis of Highly Automated Driving to Elaborate Requirements for Intelligent User Interfaces
IUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Calibration of Trust Expectancies in Conditionally Automated Driving by Brand, Reliability Information and Introductionary Videos: An Online Study
AutoUI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Mode Awareness Interfaces in Automated Vehicles, Robotics, and Aviation: A Literature Review
AutoUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Designing Adaptive AV Interfaces: Linking Acceptance Profiles to Design Preferences for Enhanced Adoption
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving
CHI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' Suggestions
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 75%
What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data
CHI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)