Calibration of Trust Expectancies in Conditionally Automated Driving by Brand, Reliability Information and Introductionary Videos: An Online Study
Authors
The design of a priori information about a conditionally automated driving (CAD) function influences the extent of effective usage of this function. The present online study investigated the effects of preliminary reliability and brand information on trust and acceptance for CAD. N = 519 participants were randomly assigned to (1) a reliability condition (high or low) and (2) an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) reputation condition (i.e., above average, average, below average, baseline). To measure the effect of CAD experience, participants were additionally exposed to four short videos of a driver interacting with a CAD function. Study results provide first evidence for an influence of OEM branding and reliability on CAD evaluation. We observed a trend towards more favorable attitudes for high compared to low reliability. This effect depends on the respective OEM reputation. The findings hold implications for the design of communication on automated vehicles to calibrate a priori assessment.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Why Do You Like To Drive Automated? A Context-Dependent Analysis of Highly Automated Driving to Elaborate Requirements for Intelligent User Interfaces
IUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Mode Awareness Interfaces in Automated Vehicles, Robotics, and Aviation: A Literature Review
AutoUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Designing Adaptive AV Interfaces: Linking Acceptance Profiles to Design Preferences for Enhanced Adoption
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Socially Adaptive Autonomous Vehicles: Effects of Contingent Driving Behavior on Drivers' Experiences
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving
CHI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' Suggestions
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 75%
What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data
CHI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)