FaceOri: Tracking Head Position and Orientation Using Ultrasonic Ranging on Earphones
Authors
Document Title
FaceOri: Tracking Head Position and Orientation Using Ultrasonic Ranging on Earphones
Document Information
- Topic Area: User Interface Design and Interaction Technology
- Keywords: Face orientation tracking, ultrasonic ranging, earphones, head pose estimation, human-computer interaction, wireless device interaction, active noise-canceling headphones, attention detection
- Conference and Year: CHI 2022, Human-Computer Interaction Conference
- DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3517698
Research Background and Problem
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- User face orientation is often indicative of interaction targets, but existing tracking methods (e.g., camera-based head orientation estimation and eye tracking) face privacy concerns, visual field requirements, and are unsuitable for non-camera devices.
- Current ultrasonic ranging methods experience performance degradation due to non-line-of-sight (NLOS) paths and Doppler effects caused by rapid head movements.
-
Importance:
- Tracking users' head position and orientation enables more natural interactions, such as convenient touchless device control, intelligent context-aware interface design, and activity tracking functionalities.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Enhancing the potential of earphones as spatial input devices by leveraging their built-in microphones for face orientation and distance measurement.
- Attempting to develop solutions without requiring extensive multi-device setups, building upon background techniques like Doppler positioning and FMCW ultrasonic ranging.
Solution
-
Proposed Solution:
- FaceOri is an ultrasonic ranging method based on earphone microphones, designed to track users' head orientation (including pitch and yaw angles) and spatial distance from sound-emitting devices.
- It utilizes speakers in existing devices to emit inaudible ultrasonic signals, received by earphone microphones for ranging.
-
Innovations:
- No additional hardware required, leveraging commercially available ANC earphones and speaker-equipped computing devices for head orientation estimation.
- Optimized FMCW ranging technology to address issues caused by non-line-of-sight (NLOS) paths and Doppler effects.
- Creatively employs non-invasive techniques to achieve calibration-free attention detection.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Audio Signal Processing: Using FMCW ranging technology, earphone microphones receive ultrasonic signals emitted by speakers and calculate time-of-arrival differences.
- Geometric Modeling: Utilizing the distance from the head center to the microphones, pitch and yaw angles are calculated using triangle-based mathematical formulas.
- Optimization Strategies: Triangularly modulated ultrasonic signals reduce Doppler effect impact, and CFAR adaptive algorithms predict frequency peaks.
- Binary Attention Detection: Without geometric calibration, a classifier is trained to extract features from audio signals to identify whether the user is facing the device.
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Results:
- Distance measurement accuracy with a median absolute error of 10.9 mm, tracking errors for yaw and pitch angles of 3.7° and 5.8°, respectively.
- FaceOri achieved a binary attention classification accuracy of 93.5%.
- Compared to the CAT baseline method, FaceOri significantly reduced frame drop rates and improved robustness against NLOS paths and rapid movements.
-
Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Avoids privacy concerns associated with camera-based technologies and is applicable to non-camera devices.
- Reduces heading drift issues compared to IMU solutions while achieving superior overall accuracy.
- Optimizes ranging performance under NLOS paths and rapid movements compared to traditional FMCW methods.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Experimental data demonstrated that FaceOri maintains high robustness against noise and positional errors when users are close to the device or rotating rapidly.
- Tests under varying relative heights and environmental noise conditions showed excellent performance even in high background noise environments.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Calibration is required to establish reference points for continuous tracking.
- Current implementation relies on external processing devices (e.g., PCs) for real-time signal processing.
- Future Directions:
- Explore more convenient calibration methods, such as integrating Bluetooth time synchronization protocols or utilizing cameras.
- Enhance deployment generality by evaluating compatibility across different earphone devices.
- Expand support for multi-device interaction, investigating more efficient frequency or signal encoding schemes.
- Limitations:
Summary: FaceOri demonstrates the feasibility of achieving head orientation and distance tracking using commercial earphones and devices, with high robustness and potential applications in intelligent interaction, activity detection, and attention-driven interface design. Future work could focus on fully user-friendly calibration methods and multi-device support.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can earphone microphones use ultrasonic ranging to accurately track users' head orientation (including pitch and yaw)?Category: Earable Interaction and SensingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can ultrasonic ranging overcome performance degradation caused by non-line-of-sight paths and rapid head movement?Category: Earable Interaction and SensingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can FaceOri improve smart interactive device functionality and UX without additional hardware?Category: Earable Interaction and SensingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Existing head orientation tracking methods have poor privacy and are unsuitable for non-camera devices.Category: Earable Interaction and SensingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
A Unified Model for User Identification on Multi-touch Surfaces. A Survey and Meta-analysis.
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Modeling the Endpoint Uncertainty in Crossing-based Moving Target Selection
CHI '20· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Quantification of Users' Visual Attention During Everyday Mobile Device Interactions
CHI '20· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Collecting Self-reported Physical Activities and Postures Data using Audio-based Ecological Momentary Assessment
UbiComp '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 60%
Squiggle: Multimodal Lasso Selection in the Real World
UIST '25· Hand Gesture Recognition +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)