Modeling the Endpoint Uncertainty in Crossing-based Moving Target Selection
Honorable MentionAuthors
Modeling the endpoint uncertainty of moving target selection with crossing is essential to understand factors such as speed-accuracy trade-off and interaction efficiency in crossing-based user interfaces with dynamic contents. However, there have been few studies looking into this research topic in the HCI field. This paper presents a Quaternary-Gaussian model to quantitatively measure the endpoint uncertainty in crossing-based moving target selection. To validate this model, we conducted an experiment with discrete crossing tasks on five factors, i.e., initial distance, size, speed, orientation, and moving direction. Results showed that our model fit the data of ? and ? accurately with adjusted R2 of 0.883 and 0.920. We also demonstrated the validity of our model in predicting error rates in crossing-based moving target selection. We concluded with a set of implications for future designs.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
A Unified Model for User Identification on Multi-touch Surfaces. A Survey and Meta-analysis.
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Quantification of Users' Visual Attention During Everyday Mobile Device Interactions
CHI '20· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Collecting Self-reported Physical Activities and Postures Data using Audio-based Ecological Momentary Assessment
UbiComp '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Your Eyes Tell: Leveraging Smooth Pursuit for Assessing Cognitive Workload
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
- 67%
FaceOri: Tracking Head Position and Orientation Using Ultrasonic Ranging on Earphones
CHI '22· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Selecting Real-World Objects via User-Perspective Phone Occlusion
CHI '23· Hand Gesture Recognition +2
- 67%
Gensors: Authoring Personalized Visual Sensors with Multimodal Foundation Models and Reasoning
IUI '25· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)