A Bermuda Triangle? - A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation

Honorable Mention
User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)Prototyping & User TestingHCI ResearchersCognitive Scientists

User experience (UX) evaluation is a growing field with diverse approaches. To understand the development since previous meta-review efforts, we conducted a state-of-the-art review of UX evaluation techniques with special attention to the triangulation between methods. We systematically selected and analyzed 100 papers from recent years and while we found an increase of relevant UX studies, we also saw a remaining overlap with pure usability evaluations. Positive trends include an increasing percentage of field rather than lab studies and a tendency to combine several methods in UX studies. Triangulation was applied in more than two thirds of the studies, and the most common method combination was questionnaires and interviews. Based on our analysis, we derive common patterns for triangulation in UX evaluation efforts. A critical discussion about existing approaches should help to obtain stronger results, especially when evaluating new technologies.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/5635/2018

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2018
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation), Prototyping & User Testing
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Cognitive Scientists
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers