helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
What geographic and socioeconomic biases do LLMs exhibit when recommending U.S. cities and towns?Direction: Fairness, Bias, and Research Governance
Algorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Stats are based on currently indexed question data; missing sources remain visible.
121
items
31
sources
2025
latest
All questions
121 items
helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Do these biases affect fair decision-making for low-income or marginalized groups?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can audit methods analyze and reveal distributional inequality in LLM geographic recommendations?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
When selecting cities through LLMs, marginalized groups are overlooked, exacerbating inequality.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
In HCI, what specific application domains and scenarios are LLMs suited for?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do researchers use LLMs in papers, and what usage patterns and roles exist?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
What types of contributions have LLMs made in HCI?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
What are the main limitations and risks of LLMs?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Designers and researchers lack systematic frameworks to evaluate LLM applications and impacts.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system be designed to generate risk reports for AI models?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can AI incident database data be combined with model card information to generate contextualized risk descriptions?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can structured risk reports be customized for different users (e.g., developers and designers)?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Risk reports in AI model files lack diversity and practicality, making risk assessment difficult for users.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How does placing algorithmic decisions in the context of systemic social injustice affect public views of algorithmic discrimination?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Does explaining how algorithms learn from and perpetuate human decision biases change public attitudes toward algorithms?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do different social groups (e.g., advantaged vs. disadvantaged groups) respond to explanations of systemic injustice?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
The public perceives algorithms as unfair, especially in high-stakes decisions involving race and gender.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can AI systems identify potential performance and ethical risks early in development?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can matrix tools effectively help teams discover mismatches between AI performance and real needs?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Can human-centered definitions of model performance improve risk assessment in AI design?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
AI systems often fail to meet real-world needs, causing errors or wasted resources.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How is generative AI actually applied in scientific organizations?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
What are the potential risks of generative AI in scientific organizations?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can generative AI tools be designed for scientific organizations to optimize efficiency and safety?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Scientific organizations struggle to balance the potential of generative AI with its risks.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can generative ghosts (AI agents that generate content) be designed to balance potential benefits with social and ethical risks?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do design dimensions of generative ghosts (e.g., anthropomorphism, identity source) affect application scenarios and social impact?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do acceptance and impact of generative ghosts differ across cultural backgrounds?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Bereaved people cannot fully obtain flexible ways to find comfort and memorialize the deceased through technology.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do different decision-maker configurations (e.g., fully automated algorithmic systems vs. human-in-the-loop hybrid systems) affect decision recipients' perceived fairness?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do interactions among decision-maker characteristics (e.g., model type and data source) affect perceived decision-maker integrity?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do perceptions of decision-makers' ability, benevolence, and integrity affect decision recipients' fairness evaluations?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Users often feel algorithmic decision systems lack procedural fairness.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can users use explanatory techniques to identify and challenge erroneous decisions in automated decision systems?CSCW '24Empowering Individuals in Automated Decision-Making: Explainability, Contestability and Beyond
helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How does detailed algorithmic explanation content affect users' ability and confidence in identifying erroneous decisions?CSCW '24Empowering Individuals in Automated Decision-Making: Explainability, Contestability and Beyond
helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can interaction-based knowledge improve AI governance policy and empower affected individuals?CSCW '24Empowering Individuals in Automated Decision-Making: Explainability, Contestability and Beyond
lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Users cannot understand or challenge AI decisions that significantly affect their lives.CSCW '24Empowering Individuals in Automated Decision-Making: Explainability, Contestability and Beyond
helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can designers independently develop personalized ethical action plans through a collaboration-based process?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Which roles and process steps can empower technology and design practitioners when developing ethical action plans?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can practitioners use modular tools to combine and reconfigure across domains when facing ethical complexity?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Designers lack practical tools to address ethical complexity in everyday work.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
What major challenges do public defenders face when challenging algorithmic tools used by government?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do existing algorithm performance test designs disconnect from real judicial scenarios?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can interdisciplinary collaboration mechanisms be designed to support public defenders in evaluating algorithm reliability?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Public defenders struggle to effectively challenge algorithmic decisions, increasing judicial error risk.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How does the magic metaphor affect user cognition of AI functionality in AI product design?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How can mystery and transparency be balanced in AI design to improve technological understanding?helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Can systematic design principles deconstruct or reinforce AI's magical atmosphere?lightbulbPractical problemAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
Users lack understanding of how AI works, leading to misconceptions about capabilities and risks.helpResearch questionAlgorithmic Decision Accountability, Contestability, and User Auditing
How do the design and application of algorithms in higher education affect student privacy, autonomy, and fairness?Related papers
IUI 2025
Unequal Opportunities: Examining the Bias in Geographical Recommendations by Large Language Models
Shiran Dudy, Thulasi Tholeti, Resmi Ramachandranpillai
CHI 2025
Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review
Rock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith
CHI 2025
RiskRAG: A Data-Driven Solution for Improved AI Model Risk Reporting
Pooja S. B. Rao, Sanja Scepanovic, Ke Zhou
CHI 2025
Lay Perceptions of Algorithmic Discrimination in the Context of Systemic Injustice
Gabriel Lima, Nina Grgić-Hlača, Markus Langer
CHI 2025
AI Mismatches: Identifying Potential Algorithmic Harms Before AI Development
Devansh Saxena, Ji-Youn Jung, Jodi Forlizzi
CHI 2025
Generative AI Uses and Risks for Knowledge Workers in a Science Organization
Kelly B. Wagman, Matthew T Dearing, Marshini Chetty
CHI 2025
Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlives
Meredith Ringel Morris, Jed R. Brubaker
CHI 2025
Towards Effective Human Intervention in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Understanding the Effect of Decision-Makers' Configuration on Decision-Subjects' Fairness Perceptions
Mireia Yurrita, Himanshu Verma, Agathe Balayn
CHI 2024
Building an Ethics-Focused Action Plan: Roles, Process Moves, and Trajectories
Colin M. Gray, Ike Obi, Shruthi Sai Chivukula
CHI 2024
(Beyond) Reasonable Doubt: Challenges that Public Defenders Face in Scrutinizing AI in Court
Angela Jin, Niloufar Salehi
CHI 2024
(Un)making AI Magic: A Design Taxonomy
Maria Luce Lupetti, Dave Murray-Rust
CHI 2024
"This is not a data problem": Algorithms and Power in Public Higher Education in Canada
Kelly McConvey, Shion Guha