Social Robots in Service Contexts: Exploring the Rewards and Risks of Personalization and Re-embodiment
Authors
Social agents and robots are moving into front-line positions in brick and mortar services, taking on roles where they directly interact with customers. These agents could potentially recognize customers to personalize service. Will customers like this, or might they feel monitored and profiled? Robots could also re-embody (move their "personality" between one body and another) in order to take on multiple roles that are typically performed by different people. Will this make customers feel more taken care of, or will it raise concerns about the robot’s competence and expertise? Our work investigates when robots should and should not recognize customers and re-embody. Our online study used storyboards to present possible future interactions between robots and customers across several different service contexts. Our findings suggest that people generally accept robots identifying customers and taking on vastly different roles. However, in some contexts, these robot behaviors seem creepy and untrustworthy
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Comedians in Cafes Getting Data: Evaluating Timing and Adaptivity in Real-World Robot Comedy Performance
HRI '20· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 75%
Impact of Multi-Robot Presence and Anthropomorphism on Human Cognition and Emotion
CHI '24· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 75%
Prompting Prosocial Human Interventions in Response to Robot Mistreatment
HRI '20· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 75%
Using the Geneva Emotion Wheel to Measure Perceived Affect in Human-Robot Interaction
HRI '20· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 60%
Exploring the Role of Conversational Cues in Guided Task Support with Virtual Assistants
CHI '18· Voice User Interface (VUI) Design +1
- 60%
User-defined Co-speech Gesture Design with Swarm Robots
CHI '25· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)