Here Comes No Boom! The Lack of Sound Feedback Effects on Performance and User Experience in a Gamified Image Classification Task
Authors
Title of the Paper
Here Comes No Boom! The Lack of Sound Feedback Effects on Performance and User Experience in a Gamified Image Classification Task
Paper Information
- Research Domain: Human-Computer Interaction, Gamification Design, Impact of Sound Feedback on User Experience and Task Performance
- Keywords: Sound Effects, Gamification, Feedback Sounds, User Experience, Microtasks, Emotional Experience, Task Performance
Research Background and Problem
- Research Question: Sound effects (SFX) are widely used in gamified systems to complement visual feedback, but their specific impact has not been systematically studied. The authors aim to investigate how SFX with different emotional characteristics affect users' task performance, emotional experience, immersion, and motivation.
- Significance: Gamification seeks to improve task experiences and enhance user engagement and performance through design elements such as points, badges, and leaderboards. However, if sound feedback fails to effectively enhance user experience, the allocation of design resources may need optimization. Therefore, uncovering the true role of sound feedback is crucial for gamification design and its broader application.
- Research Motivation: Although sound effects are common elements in games and gamified systems, their actual impact remains underexplored. For instance, how the emotional characteristics of sound (e.g., valence and arousal) influence user behavior is an open question. This study aims to fill this gap in the field.
Solution
-
Methods and Approach:
- Sound Design: Created 18 sound effects based on an emotional model (Circumplex Model of Affect) and categorized them into four groups: high valence-high arousal (HV-HA), low valence-high arousal (LV-HA), low valence-low arousal (LV-LA), and high valence-low arousal (HV-LA).
- Experimental Design: Conducted two experiments:
- Sound Induction Study: Validated the emotional characteristics of the sound effects and selected the four most representative ones.
- Gamified Platform Study: Tested the impact of sound feedback on task performance and user experience in a gamified image classification task.
- Key Techniques: Used sound design and digital audio tools such as Cubase Pro and audio synthesizers to ensure that the sound characteristics matched the target values of the emotional model. Additionally, the experiments examined the effects of arousal and valence on user experience.
-
Innovations:
- Conducted the first systematic study on the role of sound feedback in gamified systems.
- Combined the Circumplex Model of Affect with user experiments to validate whether sound design can effectively convey intended emotions.
Research Findings
-
Specific Results:
- The sound induction study confirmed that certain short-duration sound effects could indeed elicit the intended emotional responses.
- Experimental results showed that while different sound effects altered the emotional experience of auditory feedback (e.g., significantly influencing "stress/tension"), their impact on actual task performance was negligible.
-
Key Findings and Contributions:
- In gamified systems, sound feedback did not significantly affect task performance (e.g., completion time and scores), user enjoyment, immersion, or emotional experience.
- The only notable finding was that low-valence sound effects increased users' stress levels, indicating they are unsuitable for positive reinforcement.
-
Experiment and Evaluation Results:
- Task Performance: The type of sound feedback did not significantly affect task completion time or scores.
- User Experience and Motivation: Sound feedback had minimal direct impact on users' enjoyment, immersion, and motivation.
- Emotional Experience: The emotional experiences elicited by the sounds did not influence users' emotional states during task interaction.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The study was conducted in an online environment, making it impossible to standardize users' audio equipment quality and control for environmental noise.
- The brevity or repetitiveness of sound feedback may have led participants to ignore it, reflecting the dominant role of visual feedback (visual information may overshadow auditory information).
- Future studies should explore background music (as opposed to short sound effects), different task types, and more controlled sound feedback experiments in laboratory settings.
- Sound feedback design should focus on its complex characteristics and investigate deeper impacts on user experience.
Conclusion
- Core Insight: The role of sound feedback in gamified systems may be overestimated, with only limited cases (e.g., low-valence sound effects) showing negative impacts on user stress. This study suggests that sound feedback design should be based on more foundational research and operational validation rather than being mandatorily integrated into gamified systems.
- Future Research Directions: The impact of sound feedback on user experience requires further exploration, particularly in scenarios lacking visual feedback or background music. Additionally, its effects on a broader range of task types should be investigated.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do sound effects with different emotional characteristics affect user performance and emotional experience in gamified image classification tasks?Category: Game, Player, and Narrative Experience DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can sound effects as feedback enhance users' task immersion and motivation?Category: Game, Player, and Narrative Experience DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which emotionally characteristic sound effects may negatively affect users' stress experience?Category: Game, Player, and Narrative Experience DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Designers may mistakenly assume sound effects always improve UX on gamified platforms.Category: Game, Player, and Narrative Experience DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
Quantifying Wrist-Aiming Habits with A Dual-Sensor Mouse: Implications for Player Performance and Workload
CHI '24· Game UX & Player Behavior
- 60%
Designing for Bodily Interplay in Social Exertion Games
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Moving Target Selection: A Cue Integration Model
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Looks Can Be Deceiving: Using Gaze Visualisation to Predict and Mislead Opponents in Strategic Gameplay
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 60%
SuperVision: Playing with Gaze Aversion and Peripheral Vision
CHI '19· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 60%
Performance and Experience of Throwing in Virtual Reality
CHI '20· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 60%
Bot or not? User Perceptions of Player Substitution with Deep Player Behavior Models
CHI '20· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Power Play: How the Need to Empower or Overpower Other Players Predicts Preferences in League of Legends
CHI '20· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Prepare for Trouble and Make It Double: The Power Motive Predicts Pokémon Choices Based on Apparent Strength
CHI '21· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Towards the Next Generation of Gaming Wearables
CHI '21· Haptic Wearables +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)