A Critical Examination of Feedback in Early Reading Games
Authors
Learning games now play a role in both formal and informal learning, including foundational skills such as literacy. While feedback is recognised as a key pedagogical dimension of these games, particularly in early learning, there has been no research on how commercial games available to schools and parents reify learning theory into feedback. Using a systematic content analysis, we examine how evidence-based feedback principles manifest in five widely-used learning games designed to foster young children’s reading skills. Our findings highlight strengths in how games deliver feedback when players succeed. Many of the games, however, were inconsistent and not proactive when providing error feedback, often promoting trial and error strategies. Furthermore, there was a lack of support for learning the game mechanics and a preference for task-oriented rewards less deeply embedded in the gameplay. Our research provides a design and research agenda for the inclusion of feedback in early learning games.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
Tangible Tens: Evaluating a Training of Basic Numerical Competencies with an Interactive Tabletop
CHI '18· K-12 Digital Education Tools +2
- 67%
Child-Computer Interaction SIG: Ubiquity and Big Data - A Changing Technology Landscape for Children
CHI '18· Early Childhood Education Technology +1
- 67%
What's Missing: The Role of Instructional Design in Children's Games-Based Learning
CHI '19· Gamification Design +1
- 67%
EvalMe: Exploring the Value of New Technologies for In Situ Evaluation of Learning Experiences
CHI '21· K-12 Digital Education Tools +1
- 67%
Live-Streaming-Based Dual-Teacher Classes for Equitable Education: Insights and Challenges From Local Teachers' Perspective in Disadvantaged Areas
CHI '25· K-12 Digital Education Tools +1
- 67%
Developing a Group-Based Literacy Screening for German Pre-Readers: A Digital, Game-Based Approach
MobileHCI '24· Gamification Design +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)