Feels like Team Spirit: Biometric and Strategic Interdependence in Asymmetric Multiplayer VR Games
Authors
Title of the Paper
Feels like Team Spirit: Biometric and Strategic Interdependence in Asymmetric Multiplayer VR Games
Paper Information
- Topic Area: Asymmetric design in virtual reality (VR) multiplayer games and the interdependence between players in terms of strategy and biometric feedback
- Keywords: virtual reality, multiplayer games, asymmetric design, interdependence, strategy, biometric feedback
Research Background and Issues
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Current VR multiplayer game designs often focus on players using head-mounted displays (HMDs), neglecting the experience of non-HMD players.
- How asymmetric game design can optimize player experience (PX) remains unclear.
- Biometric feedback has been widely applied in single-player games, but its potential in asymmetric multiplayer games has yet to be explored.
-
Significance of the Research:
- VR games promote player interaction and immersion but may lead to player isolation.
- Asymmetric games could help connect players with different equipment or abilities, fostering social interaction and well-being.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Asymmetric design has been shown to enhance social interaction and PX, but there is a lack of in-depth exploration of how to balance player experiences.
- Harris et al. proposed a framework for asymmetric game design, emphasizing the importance of interdependence.
- Biometric feedback has demonstrated potential for increasing immersion and emotional regulation in single-player games, warranting further investigation in multiplayer contexts.
Proposed Solution
-
Method or Solution:
- Design and implement an asymmetric VR game where one player uses an HMD and another participates via a monitor.
- Introduce two types of interdependence: Strategic Interdependence (SI) and Biometric Interdependence (BI).
- The game utilizes the non-HMD player's heart rate to dynamically adjust visible game elements (e.g., laser frequency) in real time.
-
Innovative Aspects:
- First application of biometric feedback as a type of interdependence in asymmetric multiplayer games.
- Balances the experience between non-HMD and HMD players, enabling collaborative participation across different roles.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:
- Develop the game using the Unity engine, integrating HTC Vive equipment and Empatica E4 biometric sensors.
- HMD players interact with physical game environments, while non-HMD players view additional information (e.g., traps and laser paths) on a monitor.
- Use heart rate-based algorithms to adjust laser frequency and provide visual and auditory feedback to the non-HMD player.
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Results:
- Asymmetric design effectively enhanced collaboration and PX for both HMD and non-HMD player roles, including heightened immersion and social interaction.
- While the impact of biometric feedback was secondary, players reported significant psychological effects on immersion and stress levels.
- The game design successfully integrated non-HMD players, providing preliminary design recommendations.
-
Advantages:
- Compared to existing VR games, asymmetric design promoted balance and cooperation between players in different roles.
- Non-HMD players gained the ability to influence game dynamics, enhancing PX and social interaction.
-
Experimental/Evaluation Results:
- Biometric feedback mechanisms, such as heart rate and game difficulty, had minimal impact on HMD players but elicited psychological excitement and a sense of challenge for non-HMD players.
- Both player roles showed improved experiences over multiple game rounds, particularly through enhanced communication and coordination.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The impact of biometric feedback was relatively weak, suggesting the need for stronger designs and longer-term experimental data.
- Player roles were not swapped, making it difficult to verify whether experiences remained consistent after role exchange.
- Future research should explore the adaptability of biometric feedback mechanisms in long-term game designs and examine dynamic changes in player relationships.
Conclusion and Design Recommendations
- Successfully integrated non-HMD players and balanced game experiences, offering valuable insights for future asymmetric game design.
- Highlighted the positive effects of interdependence and strategic imbalance on social interaction and PX, proposing biometric feedback as a novel game mechanism.
- Encouraged future research to focus on role-swapping experiments, long-term gameplay experiences, and larger sample sizes to refine the design theory of asymmetric VR games.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can non-HMD players influence game dynamics through biofeedback mechanisms in asymmetric VR multiplayer games?Category: Multi-User and Social XR ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can asymmetric game design balance the gaming experience of HMD and non-HMD players?Category: Multi-User and Social XR ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How does the interaction between strategy and biofeedback optimize player collaboration and immersion in asymmetric VR multiplayer games?Category: Multi-User and Social XR ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Traditional VR multiplayer games often neglect non-HMD players' experience and lack balance.Category: Multi-User and Social XR ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
Pac-Many: Movement Behavior when Playing Collaborative and Competitive Games on Large Displays
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
Watch Me Play: Does Social Facilitation Apply to Digital Games?
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
Personal Space in Play: Physical and Digital Boundaries in Large-Display Cooperative and Competitive Games
CHI '20· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
Transparency, Fairness, and Coping: How Players Experience Moderation in Multiplayer Online Games
CHI '23· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
``Backseat Gaming" A Study of Co-Regulated Learning within a Collegiate Male Esports Community
CHI '24· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
Less Talk, More Trust: Understanding Players' In-game Assessment of Communication Processes in League of Legends
CHI '25· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
Characterising Gaming Group Experiences
CHI '26· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 80%
StratIncon Detector: Analyzing Strategy Inconsistencies Between Real-Time Strategy and Preferred Professional Strategy in MOBA Esports
IUI '25· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 67%
Touché: Data-Driven Interactive Sword Fighting in Virtual Reality
CHI '20· Game UX & Player Behavior +2
- 67%
Lower is Better? The Effects of Local Latencies on Competitive First-Person Shooter Game Players
CHI '21· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)