Effects of Local Latency on Game Pointing Devices and Game Pointing Tasks
Studies have shown certain game tasks such as targeting to be negatively and significantly affected by latencies as low as 41ms. Therefore it is important to understand the relationship between local latency - delays between an input action and resulting change in the display - and common gaming tasks such as targeting and tracking. In addition, games now use a variety of input devices, including touchscreens, mice, tablets and controllers. These devices provide very different combinations of direct/indirect input, absolute/relative movement, and position/rate control, and are likely to be affected by latency in different ways. We performed a study evaluating and comparing the effects of latency across four devices (touchscreen, mouse, controller and drawing tablet) on targeting and interception tasks. We analyze both throughput and path characteristics, identify differences between devices, and provide design considerations for game designers.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Impact on Players' Confidence
CHI '19· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 100%
How does Juicy Game Feedback Motivate? Testing Curiosity, Competence, and Effectance
CHI '24· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 100%
Change is Hard: Consistent Player Behavior Across Games with Conflicting Incentives
CHI '26· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 100%
Breaking Rotational Symmetry: Minimal Landmarks Stabilize Orientation in Screen-Based 3D Games
CHI '26· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 100%
Not All Those Who (Mind-)Wander Are Lost: Exploring Game-Unrelated Thoughts
DIS '24· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 75%
Playing to Wait: A Taxonomy of Idle Games
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 75%
The Effects of Badges and Avatar Identification on Play and Making in Educational Games
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 75%
Moving Target Selection: A Cue Integration Model
CHI '18· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 75%
Self-Determination Theory in HCI Games Research: Current Uses and Open Questions
CHI '20· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 75%
Flow Encourages Task Focus, but Frustration Drives Task Switching: How Reward and Effort Combine to Influence Player Engagement in a Simple Video Game
CHI '21· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)