Who Needs What Explanation? How User Traits Affect Explanation Effectiveness in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
Authors
Can personalized AI explanations improve human-AI team performance? Motivated by research on individual differences in cognitive science, we examine whether user characteristics influence the effectiveness of AI explanations in AI-assisted decision making. We study this question through preregistered experiments in two tasks. In a sentiment-analysis task, we find that individual differences in user characteristics shape how users respond to explanations, but these differences do not lead to human-AI complementarity, where the joint performance of humans and AI exceeds that of either alone. Motivated by this limitation, we design a new geography-guessing task in which humans and AI possess complementary strengths. In this setting, we again observe that user characteristics interact with explanation types, and now these effects also contribute to complementarity. These results suggest that tailoring explanations to individual users can improve performance and provide valuable insights into how personalization may enhance human-AI collaboration.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
A Survey of Collaborative Reinforcement Learning: Interactive Methods and Design Patterns
DIS '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 86%
Emulating Aggregate Human Choice Behavior and Biases with GPT Conversational Agents
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 83%
"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
CHI '20· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
You Complete Me: Human-AI Teams and Complementary Expertise
CHI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 83%
User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 83%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
IUI '19· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
I Can Do Better Than Your AI: Expertise and Explanations
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 83%
CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)