"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
Authors
To support human decision making with machine learning models, we often need to elucidate patterns embedded in the models that are unsalient, unknown, or counterintuitive to humans. While existing approaches focus on explaining machine predictions with real-time assistance, we explore model-driven tutorials to help humans understand these patterns in a train- ing phase. We consider both tutorials with guidelines from scientific papers, analogous to current practices of science communication, and automatically selected examples from training data with explanations. We use deceptive review detection as a testbed and conduct large-scale, randomized human-subject experiments to examine the effectiveness of such tutorials. We find that tutorials indeed improve human performance, with and without real-time assistance. In particular, although deep learning provides superior predictive performance than simple models, tutorials and explanations from simple models are more useful to humans. Our work suggests future directions for human-centered tutorials and explanations towards a synergy between humans and AI.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
A Survey of Collaborative Reinforcement Learning: Interactive Methods and Design Patterns
DIS '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Who Needs What Explanation? How User Traits Affect Explanation Effectiveness in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
IUI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 80%
EvAlignUX: Advancing UX Evaluation through LLM-Supported Metrics Exploration
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making Skills
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 71%
Emulating Aggregate Human Choice Behavior and Biases with GPT Conversational Agents
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 67%
You Complete Me: Human-AI Teams and Complementary Expertise
CHI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 67%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 67%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)