What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
Machine learning is an important tool for decision making, but its ethical and responsible application requires rigorous vetting of its interpretability and utility: an understudied problem, particularly for natural language processing models. We propose an evaluation of interpretation on a real task with real human users, where the effectiveness of interpretation is measured by how much it improves human performance. We design a grounded, realistic human-computer cooperative setting using a question answering task, Quizbowl. We recruit both trivia experts and novices to play this game with computer as their teammate, who communicates its prediction via three different interpretations. We also provide design guidance for natural language processing human-in-the-loop settings.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
User Reliance on AI Support for Collaborative Partner Selection
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and Overreliance
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI Advice
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Invisible Saboteurs: Sycophantic LLMs Mislead Novices in Problem-Solving Tasks
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
The Impact of Response Latency and Task Type on Human-LLM Interaction and Perception
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
“Do I Trust the AI?” Towards Trustworthy AI-Assisted Diagnosis: Understanding User Perception in LLM-Supported Clinical Reasoning
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)