A Survey of Collaborative Reinforcement Learning: Interactive Methods and Design Patterns
Authors
Zhaoxing Li
Department of Computer ScienceYunzhan Zhou
Department of Computer ScienceRecently, methods enabling humans and Artificial Intelligent (AI) agents to collaborate towards improving the efficiency of Reinforcement Learning - also called Collaborative Reinforcement Learning (CRL) - have been receiving increasing attention. In this paper, we provide a long-term, in-depth survey, investigating human-AI collaborative methods based on both interactive reinforcement learning algorithms and human-AI collaborative frameworks, between 2011 and 2020. We elucidate and discuss synergistic analysis methods of both the growth of the field and the state-of-the-art; we suggest novel technical directions and new collaboration design ideas. Specifically, we provide a new CRL classification taxonomy, as a systematic modelling tool for selecting and improving new CRL designs. Furthermore, we propose generic CRL challenges providing the research community with a guide towards effective implementation of human-AI collaboration. The aim is to empower researchers to develop more efficient and natural human-AI collaborative methods that could utilise the different strengths of humans and AI.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Who Needs What Explanation? How User Traits Affect Explanation Effectiveness in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
IUI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 86%
Emulating Aggregate Human Choice Behavior and Biases with GPT Conversational Agents
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 83%
"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
CHI '20· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
You Complete Me: Human-AI Teams and Complementary Expertise
CHI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 83%
User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 83%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
IUI '19· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
I Can Do Better Than Your AI: Expertise and Explanations
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 83%
CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)