CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents
Authors
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and are a powerful enabler for interactive systems. However, they still face challenges in long-term interactions that require adaptation towards the user as well as contextual knowledge and an understanding of the ever-changing environment. To overcome these challenges, holistic memory modeling is required to efficiently retrieve and store relevant information across sessions for accurate responses. Cognitive AI, which aims to simulate the human thought process in a computerized model, highlights interesting aspects, such as thoughts, memory mechanisms, and decision making, that can contribute towards improved memory modeling for LLMs. Inspired by these principles, we propose CAIM, a cognitive AI memory framework that models key aspects of human memory through a multi-agent architecture. Specialized LLM-based agents handle memory-related functions such as retrieval, contextual relevance evaluation, and memory maintenance. We compare CAIM against existing approaches, focusing on metrics such as retrieval accuracy, response correctness, and contextual coherence. The results demonstrate that CAIM outperforms baseline frameworks in different metrics, highlighting its context awareness and demonstrating its contribution to memory mechanisms for improving long-term human-AI interactions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
IUI '19· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
User Reliance on AI Support for Collaborative Partner Selection
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and Overreliance
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI Advice
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Invisible Saboteurs: Sycophantic LLMs Mislead Novices in Problem-Solving Tasks
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
The Impact of Response Latency and Task Type on Human-LLM Interaction and Perception
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
“Do I Trust the AI?” Towards Trustworthy AI-Assisted Diagnosis: Understanding User Perception in LLM-Supported Clinical Reasoning
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)