We present an ethnographic study of a maker community that conducted safety-driven medical making to deliver over 80,000 devices for use at medical facilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this, the community had to balance their clinical value of safety with the maker value of broadened participation in design and production. We analyse their struggles and achievement through the artifacts they produced and the labors of key facilitators between diverse community members. Based on this analysis we provide insights into how medical maker communities, which are necessarily risk-averse and safety-oriented, can still support makers' grassroots efforts to care for their communities. Based on these findings, we recommend that design tools enable adaptation to a wider set of domains, rather than exclusively presenting information relevant to manufacturing. Further, we call for future work on the portability of designs across different types of printers which could enable broader participation in future maker efforts at this scale.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/cscw/87133/2022

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3512948
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CSCW
calendar_month
Year
2022
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
work
Professions
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers