Mobilizing Social Media Data: Reflections of a Researcher Mediating between Data and Organization
Authors
This paper examines the practices involved in mobilizing social media data from their site of production to the institutional context of non-profit organizations. We report on nine months of fieldwork with a transnational and intergovernmental organization using social media data to understand the role of grassroots initiatives in Mexico, in the unique context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We show how different stakeholders negotiate the definition of problems to be addressed with social media data, the collective creation of ground-truth, and the limitations involved in the process of extracting value from data. The meanings of social media data are not defined in advance; instead, they are contingent on the practices and needs of the organization that seeks to extract insights from the analysis. We conclude with a list of reflections and questions for researchers who mediate in the mobilization of social media data into non-profit organizations to inform humanitarian action.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Facebook in Venezuela: Understanding Solidarity Economies in Low-Trust Environments
CHI '18· Social Platform Design & User Behavior +1
- 75%
The Problem of Community Engagement: Disentangling the Practices of Municipal Government
CHI '18· Community Engagement & Civic Technology
- 60%
Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale
CHI '18· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +1
- 60%
Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Non/use of Facebook
CHI '18· Social Platform Design & User Behavior +1
- 60%
Considerations for Implementing Technology to Support Community Radio in Rural Communities
CHI '20· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +1
- 60%
Keyboard Fighters: The Use of ICTs by Activists in Times of Military Coup in Myanmar
CHI '24· Social Platform Design & User Behavior +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)