Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale
Authors
Many Smart City projects are beginning to consider the role of citizens. However, current methods for engaging urban populations in participatory design activities are somewhat limited. In this paper, we describe an approach taken to empower socially disadvantaged citizens, using a variety of both social and technological tools, in a smart city project. Through analysing the nature of citizens’ concerns and proposed solutions, we explore the benefits of our approach, arguing that engaging citizens can uncover hyper-local concerns that provide a foundation for finding solutions to address citizen concerns. By reflecting on our approach, we identify four key challenges to utilising participatory design at an urban scale; balancing scale with the personal, who has control of the process, who is participating and integrating citizen-led work with local authorities. By addressing these challenges, we will be able to truly engage citizens as collaborators in co-designing their city.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Strategies for Engaging Communities in Creating Physical Civic Technologies
CHI '18· Citizen Science & Crowdsourced Data +2
- 80%
From Creating Spaces for Civic Discourse to Creating Resources for Action
CHI '20· Content Moderation & Platform Governance +2
- 75%
Between Grassroots and the Hierarchy: Lessons Learned from the Design of a Public Services Directory
CHI '18· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +1
- 75%
The Problem of Community Engagement: Disentangling the Practices of Municipal Government
CHI '18· Community Engagement & Civic Technology
- 75%
PosterTalk: Expanding Participatory Agency in Public Survey Platforms via Middle-Out Gatekeeping
DIS '23· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +1
- 75%
Involving British-Chinese Immigrants in Participatory Action Research: Lessons Learnt from the Field
DIS '23· Participatory Design
- 75%
“But Will They Listen?” Learnings From a Design After Design Experiment in Civics
DIS '24· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +1
- 67%
Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration
CHI '18· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +2
- 67%
A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing Research
CHI '22· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +2
- 67%
TalkFutures: Supporting Qualitative Practices in Distributed Community Engagements
DIS '20· Community Engagement & Civic Technology +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)