AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations
Honorable MentionAuthors
Title of the Paper
AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and Expectations
Paper Information
- Research Domain: Automated Machine Learning (AutoML), Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Privacy Protection and Customization Technologies
- Keywords: AutoML, Privacy, Transparency, Customization, User Autonomy
Research Background and Issues
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- AutoML faces issues such as lack of transparency, insufficient customization, and privacy risks.
- Current research primarily focuses on technical aspects, lacking exploration of user dynamics and coping strategies in real-world applications.
-
Significance: AutoML aims to lower the barrier to using machine learning technologies, making data science and decision-making more accessible. However, design shortcomings in complex real-world scenarios may hinder its adoption and user experience.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Existing studies on AutoML mainly concentrate on enhancing human trust, improving tool transparency, and refining process designs.
- This paper seeks to delve into user perspectives, exploring needs and practices in real-world applications and providing solutions to overcome imperfections in the technology.
Proposed Solutions
-
Methods or Solutions Proposed: Through semi-structured interviews, the authors analyzed user strategies for addressing AutoML's deficiencies (lack of transparency, customization, and privacy concerns) and summarized selective and specific usage methods employed by users.
-
Innovations:
- Introduced the concept of "user autonomous work," emphasizing how users actively create coping strategies to address technological shortcomings.
- Highlighted privacy issues, which are rarely discussed in the AutoML domain.
- Conducted a socio-technical perspective study, providing an in-depth analysis of users' actual work contexts, needs, and behavioral patterns.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Conduct semi-structured interviews to collect users' experiences and reasons for strategic use of AutoML.
- Analyze data using thematic analysis to identify major user challenges and coping strategies.
- Extract design insights to guide future optimization of AutoML platforms.
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Findings:
- Identified three major limitations of AutoML: lack of transparency, insufficient customization, and privacy risks.
- Users employed various strategies, including customizing input data, developing internal AutoML tools, manually inspecting model results, and choosing reputable platforms.
- Users selectively utilized AutoML based on specific contexts to meet performance and task requirements.
-
Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Shifted the focus from technical/functionality enhancements to "how users adjust usage in complex scenarios."
- Combined technical approaches with social and interactive design methods rooted in real-world work practices.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results: The study interviewed 19 participants from diverse fields and experience levels, effectively revealing different perspectives and challenges in AutoML's real-world usage.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Sampling limitations: Participants were primarily recruited via corporate mailing lists and social media; future studies should expand sample diversity.
- Need to explore emerging challenges, such as fairness and bias issues, and AutoML's adaptability in non-English languages or different cultural contexts.
- Proposed solutions should be translated into more quantifiable research to support universally applicable and specific design improvements.
Design Implications
-
Support for Domain Customization:
- Develop AutoML platforms with greater domain-specific focus and editability.
- Introduce prior knowledge to guide model generation in more complex scenarios.
-
Multi-dimensional Transparency:
- Provide tools for dynamic process and result transparency.
- Design explanatory visualization features suitable for non-expert users.
-
Privacy Risk Prevention:
- Integrate privacy protection notifications and privacy-enhancing technologies.
- Encourage users to minimize and anonymize data before uploading.
-
Support for Cross-Team Collaboration:
- Optimize AutoML platform adaptability by incorporating roles from different organizational teams (data scientists, legal teams, domain experts).
- Introduce design principles to support "Humans-in-the-Loops" (multi-person collaborative loops).
Acknowledgments and Research Support
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under project numbers 2212323, 1951729, and 1953893.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- What are the main limitations of AutoML in practice (e.g., insufficient transparency, lack of customization, privacy risks)?Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do users strategically work around AutoML design flaws?Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- From a user perspective, how can AutoML be improved to meet complex scenario needs?Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users struggle to obtain transparency and customization when using AutoML, and face privacy risks.Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Prompting in the Dark: Assessing Human Performance in Prompt Engineering for Data Labeling When Gold Labels Are Absent
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
XAutoML: A Visual Analytics Tool for Understanding and Validating Automated Machine Learning
IUI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
CoAutoML: User Interface Framework for Machine Learning Novices using LLM-based AutoML and Test-Driven Machine Teaching
IUI '26· AutoML Interfaces +2
- 60%
UMLAUT: Debugging Deep Learning Programs using Program Structure and Model Behavior
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial Intelligence
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Validating AI-Generated Code with Live Programming
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Model Compression in Practice: Lessons Learned from Practitioners Creating On-device Machine Learning Experiences
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Establishing Heuristics for Improving the Usability of GUI Machine Learning Tools for Novice Users
CHI '24· AutoML Interfaces +1
- 60%
Supporting Co-Adaptive Machine Teaching through Human Concept Learning and Cognitive Theories
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
InstructPipe: Generating Visual Blocks Pipelines with Human Instructions and LLMs
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)