Seemo: A Computational Approach to See Emotions
Successful human interactions are based on becoming aware of other’s emotion and making adaptations accordingly. However, understanding emotion is a complex task that has generated countless debates among researchers over the past decades. The abstract nature of human emotion highlights the need for a new data-driven approach that can better describe and compare across fine-grained emotional states. In this study, we propose Seemo, a novel neural embedding framework, which allows us to map human emotions into vector space representations. Seemo is trained using Twitter data and is evaluated on two fundamental use cases in traditional emotion research: determining the underlying dimensions of emotions and identifying the set of basic emotions. The evaluation reveals that on both tasks Seemo can generate results consistent with the mainstream theories. Results also show that the vector space representation of Seemo can effectively decode the important relationships between emotions that were usually not explicitly presented.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
Evolving User Profiles and Adoption of Cyborg Technologies: Evidence from a Repeated Cross-Sectional Study in Switzerland
CHI '26· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +2
- 80%
How to Support Users in Understanding Intelligent Systems? Structuring the Discussion
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI)
- 71%
CoBRA: Programming Cognitive Bias in Social Agents Using Classic Social Science Experiments
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 67%
The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Towards Balancing Preference and Performance through Adaptive Personalized Explainability
HRI '24· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +2
- 67%
I Can Do Better Than Your AI: Expertise and Explanations
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Taming fNIRS-based BCI Input for Better Calibration and Broader Use
UIST '21· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +1
- 60%
COGAM: Measuring and Moderating Cognitive Load in Machine Learning Model Explanations
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI)
- 60%
(Mis)Communicating with our AI Systems
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI)
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)