COGAM: Measuring and Moderating Cognitive Load in Machine Learning Model Explanations
Authors
Interpretable machine learning models trade -off accuracy for simplicity to make explanations more readable and easier to comprehend. Drawing from cognitive psychology theories in graph comprehension, we formalize readability as visual cognitive chunks to measure and moderate the cognitive load in explanation visualizations. We present Cognitive-GAM (COGAM) to generate explanations with desired cognitive load and accuracy by combining the expressive nonlinear generalized additive models (GAM) with simpler sparse linear models. We calibrated visual cognitive chunks with reading time in a user study, characterized the trade-off between cognitive load and accuracy for four datasets in simulation studies, and evaluated COGAM against baselines with users. We found that COGAM can decrease cognitive load without decreasing accuracy and/or increase accuracy without increasing cognitive load. Our framework and empirical measurement instruments for cognitive load will enable more rigorous assessment of the human interpretability of explainable AI.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
How Accurate Does It Feel? - Human Perception of Different Types of Classification Mistakes
CHI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 75%
EvAlignUX: Advancing UX Evaluation through LLM-Supported Metrics Exploration
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making Skills
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 75%
Trust and Anthropomorphism in Tandem: The Interrelated Nature of Automated Agent Appearance and Reliability in Trustworthiness Perceptions
DIS '21· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 75%
How to Support Users in Understanding Intelligent Systems? Structuring the Discussion
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI)
- 60%
Seemo: A Computational Approach to See Emotions
CHI '18· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +1
- 60%
Explaining Decision-Making Algorithms through UI: Strategies to Help Non-Expert Stakeholders
CHI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
CHI '20· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 60%
The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
User Characteristics in Explainable AI: The Rabbit Hole of Personalization?
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)