Game Changers: Exploring Player Perspectives of Digital Game Modification

Game UX & Player BehaviorSerious & Functional GamesGamification DesignGame Developers & Designers

Paper Title

Game Changers: Exploring Player Perspectives of Digital Game Modification

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Player perspectives on digital game modifications, including motivations, effects, and ethics.
  • Keywords: digital games, game modification, player agency, ethics, accessibility, community norms, personalization, leet play, social connection, technology.

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Research on game modifications is limited by narrow frameworks, often focusing on cheating or accessibility, which fail to capture the broader dynamics of modification practices, motivations, and outcomes.
  • Significance: Understanding game modification is crucial for designing systems that enhance player experiences while addressing ethical concerns and supporting accessibility.
  • Motivation and related work: Prior studies have explored specific types of modifications (e.g., mods, accessibility features) or framed them as tools for cheating or accessibility. However, these approaches lack a comprehensive view of the diverse ways players modify games and the associated benefits and harms. This paper aims to address this gap by taking a broad and neutral perspective on game modification.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: A broad and agnostic exploration of player perspectives on game modification through a qualitative survey of 167 participants.
  • Novelty:
    1. Development of a comprehensive categorization of game modifications based on methods (e.g., software, hardware, settings) and alterations (e.g., content, mechanics, aesthetics).
    2. Identification of six core findings about modification: playfulness, agency, social connection, community norms, leet play, and technology.
    3. Exploration of ethical considerations and the role of community norms in shaping modification practices.
    4. Integration of diverse player motivations and experiences into a unified framework.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Conducted an online survey with open-ended questions to gather diverse player experiences.
    • Used reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns across responses.
    • Categorized modification methods and alterations into hierarchical structures for analysis.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Players modify games using methods like mods (119 instances), walkthroughs (40), and cheats (31), resulting in alterations to content (180 instances), mechanics (89), aesthetics (37), and utility (34).
    • Six core findings:
      1. Modifications enhance enjoyment, creativity, and engagement.
      2. Players use modifications to exercise agency and personalize gameplay.
      3. Modification communities foster social connection and learning.
      4. Community norms guide ethical boundaries for modification use.
      5. Modification users exhibit characteristics of leet (elite) play.
      6. Technology presents both opportunities and challenges for modification.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • Broader scope compared to prior studies, capturing diverse motivations and ethical considerations.
    • Highlights the interplay between player agency, community norms, and technical challenges in modification practices.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Surveyed 167 participants with recent modification experience.
    • Analyzed responses using thematic coding to identify motivations, effects, and ethical perspectives.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Limited depth due to survey-based methodology; in-depth interviews could provide richer insights.
    • Focused on English-speaking, Western participants, potentially excluding diverse cultural perspectives.
    • Future work could explore perspectives of non-modifying players, developers, and modification creators.

Summary

This study explores the diverse perspectives of 167 players on digital game modification, identifying motivations, effects, and ethical considerations. It categorizes modifications by methods and alterations, revealing six core findings related to play, agency, social connection, norms, leet play, and technology. The results suggest that modifications significantly enhance player experiences and challenge narrow, cynical views of modification as primarily cheating. The study advocates for greater developer support for ethical modifications while acknowledging the need for further research to address stakeholder concerns and optimize integration into digital games.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/222825/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791547
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Game UX & Player Behavior, Serious & Functional Games, Gamification Design
work
Professions
Game Developers & Designers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers