Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototyping
Honorable MentionAuthors
Explainable AI (XAI)AI-Assisted Decision-Making & AutomationAI Ethics, Fairness & AccountabilityAI/ML Researchers & EngineersHCI Researchers
Document Title
Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototyping
Document Information
- Subject Area: Artificial Intelligence, Responsible AI Development, Tool Design, and Human-Computer Interaction
- Keywords: Responsible AI, Human-AI Collaboration, Large Language Models, Prototype Development, Social Harm Assessment
Research Background and Problem
- Problem and Challenges: With the rapid growth of AI, large language models (LLMs) and prompt tools have made AI application prototyping more accessible. However, this stage often fails to identify potential social harms, especially for non-technical users such as designers and lawyers. Existing tools primarily target machine learning experts and cannot effectively assist diverse user groups in predicting or mitigating these risks.
- Importance: Preventing and reducing harm in the early stages of application development is a crucial step to avoid the negative social impacts of technology. Addressing this issue contributes to enhancing the responsibility and safety of AI.
- Research Motivation: Establishing support mechanisms during the early design phase of generative AI tools to raise developers' awareness of social harm while integrating related frameworks, such as harm scenario modeling.
Solution
- Method and Tool: An interactive tool named Farsight is proposed, integrated into existing AI prototyping environments (e.g., Google AI Studio), to help users identify potential social harms in LLM application development.
- The tool uses embedded similarity analysis to prompt users with AI incident reports related to their inputs.
- It provides potential use cases, affected stakeholders, and possible harms generated by LLMs.
- Includes an interactive interface (e.g., node tree) allowing users to edit, add, delete harms, or generate content.
- Innovation: The tool is designed not only for technical personnel but also for users from diverse backgrounds, enabling harm prediction during the development phase through human-AI collaboration. It extends the concept of responsible AI to non-technical groups using a progressive disclosure design to minimize user disruption.
- Implementation Steps and Technologies:
- Real-Time Alerts: Embedded similarity analysis displays relevant AI incidents and risks.
- Sidebar Content Presentation: Provides clickable expandable news events and LLM-generated use cases with harm classifications.
- Harm Envisioner Module: Interactive node tree for users to visualize and edit generated content.
- Technical Architecture: Supported by TensorFlow.js, D3.js, and other technologies for machine learning and data visualization.
- Open-Source Integration: Can be integrated into any web environment for further research and development.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Outcomes:
- The Farsight tool significantly enhances users' ability to independently predict social harms.
- Helps users expand their focus to include indirect stakeholders and cascading harms.
- Compared to existing responsible AI tools, it notably improves users' ability to construct harm scenarios autonomously.
- Experiment and Evaluation Results:
- An evaluation study with 42 AI prototyping users showed that using Farsight significantly increased the number of identified harms.
- Users expressed high approval of the tool's design, finding it more useful and user-friendly than existing resources.
- Quantitative experiments demonstrated that versions with higher user engagement achieved better performance.
- Advantages and Limitations:
- Advantages: The tool excels in generating non-traditional user scenarios compared to existing tools and encourages users to actively reflect on AI harms.
- Limitations:
- The quality of generated content may not fully meet user expectations in certain cases.
- The tool does not provide actionable harm mitigation recommendations.
- Future Directions:
- Further exploration of providing substantive and specific harm mitigation recommendations during the prototyping phase.
- Conducting long-term studies to measure the lasting impact of users' responsible AI awareness.
- Improving the quality and personalization of generated content for diverse user backgrounds.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can users identify potential social harms during AI application prototyping?Category: AI Understanding, Task Delegation, and Algorithm GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can non-technical users improve understanding and reflection on AI accountability issues through tools?Category: AI Understanding, Task Delegation, and Algorithm GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can interactive tools support users in constructing more comprehensive AI harm scenarios?Category: AI Understanding, Task Delegation, and Algorithm GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Non-technical users struggle to identify potential social harms early in AI development.Category: AI Understanding, Task Delegation, and Algorithm GovernanceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is Made
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 100%
Trusting Autonomous Teammates in Human-AI Teams - A Literature Review
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 83%
Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 83%
“I Don’t Think RAI Applies to My Model” – Engaging Non-champions with Sticky Stories for Responsible AI Work
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 83%
Do People Appropriately Rely on AI-Advice? An Analytical Review of HCI Research on Human-AI Decision-Making
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 83%
Investigating How Leaders Decide on AI Innovations: Opportunities for HCI
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 80%
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
One AI Does Not Fit All: A Cluster Analysis of the Laypeople’s Perception of AI Roles
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
Editable XAI: Toward Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment with Co-Editable Explanations of Interpretable Attributes
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642335
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Explainable AI (XAI), AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation, AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability
work
Professions
AI/ML Researchers & Engineers, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers