How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality

External HMI (eHMI) — Communication with Pedestrians & CyclistsSocial & Collaborative VRAutomotive Manufacturers & Vehicle DesignersAutonomous Driving Engineers & Test DriversPedestrians & Vulnerable Road Users

Automated vehicles (AVs) introduce a new challenge to human-computer interaction (HCI): pedestrians are no longer able to communicate with human drivers. Hence, new HCI designs need to fill this gap. This work presents the implementation and comparison of different interaction concepts in virtual reality (VR). They were derived after an analysis of 28 works from research and industry, which were classified into five groups according to their complexity and the type of communication. We implemented one concept per group for a within-subject experiment in VR. For each concept, we varied if the AV is going to stop and how early it starts to activate its display. We observed effects on safety, trust, and user experience. A good concept displays information on the street, uses unambiguous signals (e.g., green lights) and has high visibility. Additional feedback, such as continuously showing the recognized pedestrian's location, seem to be unnecessary and may irritate.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/auto_ui/7200/2019

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
AutoUI
calendar_month
Year
2019
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
External HMI (eHMI) — Communication with Pedestrians & Cyclists, Social & Collaborative VR
work
Professions
Automotive Manufacturers & Vehicle Designers, Autonomous Driving Engineers & Test Drivers, Pedestrians & Vulnerable Road Users
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers