Designing Reflective Derived Metrics for Fitness Trackers
Authors
Personal tracking devices are equipped with more and more sensors and offer an ever-increasing level of accuracy. Yet, this comes at the cost of increased complexity. To deal with that problem, fitness trackers use derived metrics---scores calculated based on sensor data, e.g. a stress score. This means that part of the agency in interpreting health data is transferred from the user to the tracker. In this paper, we investigate the consequences of that transition and study how derived metrics can be designed to offer an optimal personal informatics experience. We conducted an online survey and a series of interviews which examined a health score (a hypothetical derived metric) at three levels of abstraction. We found that the medium abstraction level led to the highest level of reflection. Further, we determined that presenting the metric without contextual information led to decreased transparency and meaning. Our work contributes guidelines for designing effective derived metrics. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569475
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How should activity tracker-derived metrics such as health scores be designed to enhance users' reflective capacity?Category: Self-Tracking and Personal Data Reflection ToolsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do metric designs at different abstraction levels (high, medium, low) affect user reflection, transparency, and sense of meaning?Category: Self-Tracking and Personal Data Reflection ToolsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can derived metric design strengthen users' understanding of health indicators and ability to act?Category: Self-Tracking and Personal Data Reflection ToolsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users struggle to understand abstract health scores on activity trackers and do not know how to improve their health.Category: Self-Tracking and Personal Data Reflection ToolsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Activity Tracking in vivo
CHI '18· Fitness Tracking & Physical Activity Monitoring
- 100%
Understanding People’s Experience for Physical Activity Planning and Exploring the Impact of Historical Records on Plan Creation and Execution
CHI '22· Fitness Tracking & Physical Activity Monitoring
- 100%
ProxiFit: Proximity Magnetic Sensing Using a Single Commodity Mobile toward Holistic Weight Exercise Monitoring
UbiComp '23· Fitness Tracking & Physical Activity Monitoring
- 75%
Supporting Meaningful Personal Fitness: the Tracker Goal Evolution Model
CHI '18· Fitness Tracking & Physical Activity Monitoring +1
- 75%
Persuading to Reflect: Role of Reflection and Insight in Persuasive Systems Design for Physical Health
CHI '18· Mental Health Apps & Online Support Communities +1
- 75%
Interactive Feedforward for Improving Performance and Maintaining Intrinsic Motivation in VR Exergaming
CHI '18· Serious & Functional Games +1
- 75%
ExerCube vs. Personal Trainer: Evaluating a Holistic, Immersive, and Adaptive Fitness Game Setup
CHI '19· Serious & Functional Games +1
- 75%
As Light as You Aspire to Be: Changing Body Perception with Sound to Support Physical Activity
CHI '19· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +1
- 75%
Embedding a VR Game Studio in a Sedentary Workplace: Use, Experience and Exercise Benefits
CHI '20· Social & Collaborative VR +1
- 75%
The Design Space of Wearables for Sports and Fitness Practices
CHI '21· Fitness Tracking & Physical Activity Monitoring +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)