Key Considerations for Domain Expert Involvement in LLM Design and Evaluation: An Ethnographic Study
Authors
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly developed for use in complex professional domains, yet little is known about how teams design and evaluate these systems in practice. This paper examines the challenges and trade-offs in LLM development through a 12-week ethnographic study of a team building a pedagogical chatbot. The researcher observed design and evaluation activities and conducted interviews with both developers and domain experts. Analysis revealed four key practices: creating workarounds for data collection, turning to augmentation when expert input was limited, co-developing evaluation criteria with experts, and adopting hybrid expert–developer–LLM evaluation strategies. These practices show how teams made strategic decisions under constraints and demonstrate the central role of domain expertise in shaping the system. Challenges included expert motivation and trust, difficulties structuring participatory design, and questions around ownership and integration of expert knowledge. We propose design opportunities for future LLM development workflows that emphasize AI literacy, transparent consent, and frameworks recognizing evolving expert roles.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 86%
Mapping the Wizards' Path: A Systematic Review of Wizard-of-Oz in HCI
CHI '26· Participatory Design +3
- 75%
Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research Ideation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 75%
Criticality: Scaffolding Decision-Making with Interactive Critical Thinking and Evidence-Based Reasoning Traces
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 71%
AI of Oz: Enhancing Wizard of Oz Studies in HCI with AI Assistance for Human Moderation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Reflexis: Supporting Reflexivity and Rigor in Collaborative Qualitative Analysis though Design for Deliberation
CHI '26· Participatory Design +2
- 71%
Through the Lens of Human-Human Collaboration: An Configurable Research Platform for Exploring Human-Agent Collaboration
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
LLM-based In-situ Thought Exchanges for Critical Paper Reading
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
DiscipLink: Unfolding Interdisciplinary Information Seeking Process via Human-AI Co-Exploration
UIST '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 67%
"Shall We Dig Deeper?": Designing and Evaluating Strategies for LLM Agents to Advance Knowledge Co-Construction in Asynchronous Online Discussions
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 67%
TurnStyle: A Framework for Analyzing Human Conversational Behaviors to Predict Success in LLM-Assisted Tasks
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)