DiscipLink: Unfolding Interdisciplinary Information Seeking Process via Human-AI Co-Exploration
Authors
Interdisciplinary studies often require researchers to explore literature in diverse branches of knowledge. Yet, navigating through the highly scattered knowledge from unfamiliar disciplines poses a significant challenge. In this paper, we introduce DiscipLink, a novel interactive system that facilitates collaboration between researchers and large language models (LLMs) in interdisciplinary information seeking (IIS). Based on users' topic of interest, DiscipLink initiates exploratory questions from the perspectives of possible relevant fields of study, and users can further tailor these questions. DiscipLink then supports users in searching and screening papers under selected questions by automatically expanding queries with disciplinary-specific terminologies, extracting themes from retrieved papers, and highlighting the connections between papers and questions. Our evaluation, comprising a within-subject comparative experiment and an open-ended exploratory study, reveals that DiscipLink can effectively support researchers in breaking down disciplinary boundaries and integrating scattered knowledge in diverse fields. The findings underscore the potential of LLM-powered tools in fostering information-seeking practices and bolstering interdisciplinary research.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
LLM-based In-situ Thought Exchanges for Critical Paper Reading
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
CollabCoder: A Lower-barrier, Rigorous Workflow for Inductive Collaborative Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
InterFlow: Designing Unobtrusive AI to Empower Interviewers in Semi-Structured Interviews
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 80%
How to Write CHI Papers -- Second Edition
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 80%
How to Write CHI Papers -- Second Edition
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 80%
Empirical Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 80%
Crowdsourcing vs Laboratory-Style Social Acceptability Studies? Examining the Social Acceptability of Spatial User Interactions for Head-Worn Displays
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 80%
Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 80%
Cody: An AI-Based System to Semi-Automate Coding for Qualitative Research
CHI '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Kaleidoscope: A Reflective Documentation Tool for a User Interface Design Course
CHI '23· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)