Interactive Reasoning: Visualizing and Controlling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
Authors
The output quality of large language models (LLMs) can be improved via “reasoning”: generating segments of chain-of-thought (CoT) content to further condition the model prior to producing user-facing output. While these chains contain valuable information, they are verbose and lack explicit organization, making them tedious to review. Moreover, they lack opportunities for user feedback, such as removing unwanted considerations, adding desired ones, or clarifying unclear assumptions. We introduce Interactive Reasoning, an interaction design that visualizes chain-of-thought outputs as a hierarchy of topics and enables user review and modification. We implement interactive reasoning in Hippo, a prototype for AI-assisted decision making in the face of uncertain trade-offs. In a user study with 16 participants, we find that interactive reasoning in Hippo allows users to quickly identify and interrupt erroneous generations, efficiently steer the model towards customized responses, and better understand both model reasoning and model outputs. Our work contributes to a new paradigm that incorporates user oversight into LLM reasoning processes.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Gamut: A Design Probe to Understand How Data Scientists Understand Machine Learning Models
CHI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 75%
How Do Analysts Understand and Verify AI-Assisted Data Analyses?
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and Overreliance
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI Advice
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Debugging Defective Visualizations: Empirical Insights Informing a Human-AI Co‑Debugging System
CHI '26· Interactive Data Visualization +2
- 75%
Interactive Explainable Ranking
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 75%
Belief Updating and Delegation in Multi-Task Human–AI Interaction: Evidence from Controlled Simulations
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Strategic Tradeoffs Between Humans and AI in Multi-Agent Bargaining
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Making Absence Visible in Intelligent Summarization Interfaces
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
How Users Perceive Mixed-Initiative AI: Attitudes Toward Assistance in Problem Solving
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)