Gamut: A Design Probe to Understand How Data Scientists Understand Machine Learning Models
Authors
Without good models and the right tools to interpret them, data scientists risk making decisions based on hidden biases, spurious correlations, and false generalizations. This has led to a rallying cry for model interpretability. Yet the concept of interpretability remains nebulous, such that researchers and tool designers lack actionable guidelines for how to incorporate interpretability into models and accompanying tools. Through an iterative design process with expert machine learning researchers and practitioners, we designed a visual analytics system, Gamut, to explore how interactive interfaces could better support model interpretation. Using Gamut as a probe, we investigated why and how professional data scientists interpret models, and how interface affordances can support data scientists in answering questions about model interpretability. Our investigation showed that interpretability is not a monolithic concept: data scientists have different reasons to interpret models and tailor explanations for specific audiences, often balancing competing concerns of simplicity and completeness. Participants also asked to use Gamut in their work, highlighting its potential to help data scientists understand their own data.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 86%
Drava: Aligning Human Concepts with Machine Learning Latent Dimensions for the Visual Exploration of Small Multiples
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 86%
Vipera: Blending Visual and LLM-Driven Guidance for Systematic Auditing of Text-to-Image Generative AI
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 86%
From Overload to Convergence: Supporting Multi-Issue Human–AI Negotiation with Bayesian Visualization
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 75%
Interactive Reasoning: Visualizing and Controlling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +3
- 71%
Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
No Explainability without Accountability: An Empirical Study of Explanations and Feedback in Interactive ML
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
User Ex Machina : Simulation as a Design Probe in Human-in-the-Loop Text Analytics
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 71%
ESCAPE: Countering Systematic Errors from Machine's Blind Spots via Interactive Visual Analysis
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-Consistency
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI Advice
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)