Making Absence Visible in Intelligent Summarization Interfaces
Authors
Intelligent interfaces increasingly use large language models to summarize user-generated content, yet these summaries emphasize what is mentioned while overlooking what is missing. This presence bias can mislead users who rely on summaries to make decisions. We present Domain Informed Summarization through Contrast (DiSCo), an expectation-based computational approach that makes absences visible by comparing each entity’s content with domain topical expectations captured in reference distributions of aspects typically discussed in comparable accommodations. This comparison identifies aspects that are either unusually emphasized or missing relative to domain norms and integrates them into the generated text. In a user study across three accommodation domains, namely ski, beach, and city center, DiSCo summaries were rated as more detailed and useful for decision making than baseline large language model summaries, although slightly harder to read. The findings show that modeling expectations reduces presence bias and improves both transparency and decision support in intelligent summarization interfaces.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI Advice
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
Belief Updating and Delegation in Multi-Task Human–AI Interaction: Evidence from Controlled Simulations
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
Strategic Tradeoffs Between Humans and AI in Multi-Agent Bargaining
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
"Un-default" Behavior Tuning: Specifying Model Behavior outside the Norm with LLM Self-Playing and Self-Improving
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
IUI '19· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
User Reliance on AI Support for Collaborative Partner Selection
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
EvalAssist: Insights on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-Assisted Judgment Strategy Preferences
UIST '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)