Say What? Real-time Linguistic Guidance Supports Novices in Writing Utterances for Conversational Agent Training
Authors
Writing utterances to train conversational agents can be a challenging and time-consuming task, and usually requires substantial expertise, meaning that novices face a steep learning curve. We investigated whether novices could be guided to produce utterances that adhere to best practices via an intervention of real-time linguistic feedback. We conducted a user study in which participants were tasked with writing training utterances for a particular topic (intent) for a conversational agent. Participants received one of two types of linguistic guidance in real-time to shape their utterance-writing: (1) feedback on the lexical and syntactic properties and the variety of each utterance, or (2) sample utterances written by other users, to select or inspire the writing of new utterances. All participants also completed a control condition, in which they wrote utterances for a different intent without receiving any guidance. We investigated whether linguistic properties of the utterances differed as a function of whether the participant had received guidance, and if so, which type. Results showed that participants wrote longer and better quality utterances, with greater lexical and syntactic diversity, in both guidance conditions compared to when they received no guidance. These results demonstrate that giving novices explicit linguistic guidance can improve the quality of the training utterances they write, suggesting that this could be an effective way of getting new utterance writers started with much less training than most current practices require.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can real-time linguistic guidance help non-experts write high-quality conversational agent training corpora?Category: AI Teaching Agents and Chatbot-Assisted LearningSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do guidance conditions for linguistic diversity and example utterance display affect training corpus quality?Category: AI Teaching Agents and Chatbot-Assisted LearningSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How effective are real-time feedback mechanisms that reduce linguistic repetition and grammatical similarity?Category: AI Teaching Agents and Chatbot-Assisted LearningSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Non-experts often struggle to meet linguistic quality standards when writing dialogue training corpora.Category: AI Teaching Agents and Chatbot-Assisted LearningSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
PEANUT: A Human-AI Collaborative Tool for Annotating Audio-Visual Data
UIST '23· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 60%
Iris: A Conversational Agent for Complex Tasks
CHI '18· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 60%
Slide4N: Creating Presentation Slides from Computational Notebooks with Human-AI Collaboration
CHI '23· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +1
- 60%
"The Diagram is like Guardrails": Structuring GenAI-assisted Hypotheses Exploration with an Interactive Shared Representation
C&C '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
GridBook: Natural Language Formulas for the Spreadsheet Grid
IUI '22· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
PUMICE: A Multi-Modal Agent that Learns Concepts and Conditionals from Natural Language and Demonstrations
UIST '19· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 60%
Snowy: Recommending Utterances for Conversational Visual Analysis
UIST '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Rethinking Dataset Discovery with DataScout
UIST '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)