The Bot on Speaking Terms: The Effects of Conversation Architecture on Perceptions of Conversational Agents
Authors
Conversational agents mimic natural conversation to interact with users. Since the effectiveness of interactions strongly depends on users’ perception of agents, it is crucial to design agents’ behaviors to provide the intended user perceptions. Research on human-agent and human-human communication suggests that speech specifics are associated with perceptions of communicating parties, but there is a lack of systematic understanding of how speech specifics of agents affect users' perceptions. To address this gap, we present a framework outlining the relationships between elements of agents’ conversation architecture (dialog strategy, content affectiveness, content style and speech format) and aspects of users’ perception (interaction, ability, sociability and humanness). Synthesized based on literature reviewed from the domains of HCI, NLP and linguistics (n=57), this framework demonstrates both the identified relationships and the areas lacking empirical evidence. We discuss the implications of the framework for conversation design and highlight the inconsistencies with terminology and measurements.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do linguistic features in dialogue architecture affect user perceptions of conversational agents?Category: Trust, Transparency, and Response Latency DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which aspects of user perception (e.g., interactivity, competence) are associated with specific dialogue architecture elements?Category: Trust, Transparency, and Response Latency DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What underexplored factors must be considered when designing conversational architectures that promote trust and utility?Category: Trust, Transparency, and Response Latency DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- User perceptions of conversational agents often diverge from design expectations, affecting the user experience.Category: Trust, Transparency, and Response Latency DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
IdeaBot: Investigating Social Facilitation in Human-Machine Team Creativity
CHI '21· Conversational Chatbots +3
- 60%
Strategies for Fostering a Genuine Feeling of Connection in Technologically Mediated Systems
CHI '22· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 60%
AXNav: Replaying Accessibility Tests from Natural Language
CHI '24· Voice Accessibility +1
- 60%
Apple’s Knowledge Navigator: Why Doesn’t that Conversational Agent Exist Yet?
CHI '24· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 60%
User-defined Co-speech Gesture Design with Swarm Robots
CHI '25· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 60%
"All Rise for the AI Director": Eliciting Possible Futures of Voice Technology through Story Completion
DIS '20· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 60%
BigBlueBot: Teaching Strategies for Successful Human-Agent Interactions
IUI '19· Conversational Chatbots +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)