Researchers across various fields have investigated how users experience moderation with different perspectives and methodologies. At present, there is a pressing need to synthesize and extract key insights from prior literature in order to formulate a systematic understanding of what constitutes a moderation experience and to explore how such understanding could further moderation-related research and practice. To answer this question, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify and analyze 42 empirical articles published between January 2016 and March 2022. We describe these studies’ characteristics, characterize user experiences with moderation systems, and identify primary perspectives to conceptualize moderation experience. These findings suggest an expansive scope of research interests in understanding moderation experiences and considering moderated users as an important stakeholder group to reflect on current moderation design but also pertain to the dominance of the punitive, solutionist logic in moderation and ample implications for future moderation research, design, and practice.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/cscw/124399/2023

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CSCW
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
—
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers