Designing and Evaluating mHealth Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review
Honorable MentionAuthors
Diverse disciplines, including Human-Computer Interaction have explored how mobile health (mHealth) applications can transform healthcare and health promotion. Increasingly, research has explored how mHealth tools can promote healthy behaviors within vulnerable populations—groups that disproportionately experience barriers to wellness. We conducted a systematic review of 83 papers from diverse disciplines to characterize the design and impact of mHealth tools in low-socioeconomic (low-SES) and racial/ethnic minority individuals. Our findings highlight that the diversity within low-SES and racial/ethnic minority groups was not reflected in the populations studied. Most studies focused on improving the health of individuals, often neglecting factors at the community and society levels that influence health disparities. Moreover, few improvements in health outcomes were demonstrated. We further discuss factors that acted as barriers and facilitators of mHealth intervention adoption. Our findings highlight trends that can drive critically needed digital health innovations for vulnerable populations.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Cripping the Co-Design of Pacing Technologies For Energy-Limiting Conditions
CHI '25· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +2
- 67%
Norms Matter: Contrasting Social Support Around Behavior Change in Online Weight Loss Communities
CHI '18· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +1
- 67%
Living Memory Home: Understanding Continuing Bond in the Digital Age through Backstage Grieving
CHI '21· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +1
- 67%
Mood Measurement on Smartphones: Which Measure, Which Design?
UbiComp '23· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)