Beyond Being Real: A Sensorimotor Control Perspective on Interactions in Virtual Reality
Authors
Title of the Paper
Beyond Being Real: A Sensorimotor Control Perspective on Interactions in Virtual Reality
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Virtual Reality (VR) Interaction Design
- Keywords: Virtual Reality, Interaction Design, Framework, Sensorimotor Control, Beyond-Real Interaction, Technology Classification, User Experience, Spatial Transformation, Body Representation, Temporal Alteration
Research Background and Issues
-
Problems or Challenges:
- Current virtual reality interactions largely mimic the real world rather than exploring the unique advantages of virtual environments.
- Effectively utilizing "beyond-real" techniques in VR interaction design remains an unresolved issue.
- There is a lack of deep understanding of how sensorimotor control systems adapt to "beyond-real" interaction designs.
-
Significance:
- By leveraging "beyond-real" approaches, VR can transcend real-world experiences, enhancing efficiency, ergonomic design, and accessibility through manipulation of sensory input and output mappings.
- In "beyond-imitation" interactions, design principles and the long-term effects of user learning are particularly critical, with potential implications for improving overall user experience.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Historically, many VR studies and design practices have attempted to enhance task performance through non-natural interaction methods.
- The authors reference literature discussing sensory dominance phenomena and user adaptation to repetitive sensory conflict stimuli, laying the groundwork for exploring future beyond-real interactions.
Solutions
-
Proposed Methods and Solutions:
- A "beyond-real" framework based on human sensorimotor control is proposed.
- A three-category classification—"realistic interaction," "illusory interaction," and "beyond-real interaction"—is introduced, categorizing previously proposed VR interaction techniques.
- Various "beyond-real" transformation techniques developed over 30 years of research are investigated and categorized, focusing on transformations in three core dimensions: space, body representation, and time.
-
Innovations:
- A systematic exploration of "beyond-real" interactions in VR from the perspective of sensorimotor control.
- A clear three-stage transformation framework (sensing and tracking, data transformation, rendering and feedback) is proposed to describe the transitions between the virtual world and real-world inputs.
-
Implementation Steps:
- Literature Retrieval and Filtering: Relevant papers from conferences such as CHI, IEEE VR, and UIST were retrieved, analyzing a total of 97 papers on "beyond-real" interactions.
- Building a Classification Framework: By introducing optimal control theory and integrating sensory integration theory, the "realism and sensory mismatch" in VR systems is described.
- Technology Classification:
- Spatial Transformation: Includes techniques such as "scaling," "position shifting," and "duplication."
- Body Representation Transformation: Includes "body morphology changes" and "motion remapping."
- Temporal Transformation: Includes "time travel" and "speed alteration."
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Findings:
- The Beyond Being Real framework was proposed, offering a new perspective for designing beyond-real VR interactions in the future.
- A systematic review of beyond-real interaction techniques developed over the past 30 years was conducted, covering 51 selection techniques, 43 manipulation techniques, and 37 navigation techniques.
- It was found that most techniques focus on modifications to space and body representation, with relatively few exploring time-related techniques.
-
Advantages:
- The framework provides designers with a unified language to describe strategies and outcomes of sensory conflicts.
- It offers a theoretical foundation for introducing dynamic environmental sensory feedback and adapting to new interaction models.
-
Experimental and Evaluation Results:
- Analysis of 97 beyond-real research studies reveals an important trend: research paradigms are increasingly shifting towards dynamically adjusting user representations and feedback to enhance naturalness.
- Limitations include a lack of focus on long-term user adaptability and post-use cognitive effects in most studies.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The framework's description of sensorimotor control systems is overly simplified (e.g., it does not fully capture multi-level sensory interactions).
- The scope of the literature review is limited to a few conferences; future work could expand to a broader range of fields and interactions.
- Emphasis is needed on the long-term development of user feedback adaptation effects and individual differences.
- Exploration of the potential for enhancing social VR and non-visual sensory interactions (e.g., olfactory or auditory) is recommended.
Conclusion
This study systematically frames the concept of beyond-real interactions in VR, emphasizing the integration of "realism matching" and "sensory innovation" in future VR applications. It advocates for the design of creative interaction methods that align with user learning patterns and adapt to their needs.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can a systematic framework based on sensorimotor control theory guide beyond-real VR interaction design?Category: XR Embodied Interaction and Body MappingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do transformation techniques for space, body representation, and time respectively affect VR UX?Category: XR Embodied Interaction and Body MappingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which beyond-real interaction techniques are widely adopted, and which need further exploration and improvement?Category: XR Embodied Interaction and Body MappingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Current VR interaction largely mimics reality rather than exploiting unique advantages of virtual environments.Category: XR Embodied Interaction and Body MappingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
The Dream is Collapsing: The Experience of Exiting VR
CHI '18· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
Using Presence Questionnaires in Virtual Reality
CHI '19· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
FTVR in VR: Evaluation of 3D Perception With a Simulated Volumetric Fish-Tank Virtual Reality Display
CHI '19· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
Breaking The Experience: Effects of Questionnaires in VR User Studies
CHI '20· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
Effects of Emotion and Agency on Presence in Virtual Reality
CHI '21· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
Locomotion Vault: the Extra Mile in Analyzing VR Locomotion Techniques
CHI '21· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
Effects of Field of View on Egocentric Distance Perception in Virtual Reality
CHI '22· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
Realism and Field of View Affect Presence in VR but Not the Way You Think
CHI '23· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
A Survey On Measuring Presence in Mixed Reality
CHI '24· Immersion & Presence Research
- 100%
When Do We Feel Present in a Virtual Reality? Towards Sensitivity and User Acceptance of Presence Questionnaires
CHI '25· Immersion & Presence Research
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)