A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Honorable MentionAuthors
A growing number of people are working as part of on-line crowd work. Crowd work is often thought to be low wage work. However, we know little about the wage distribution in practice and what causes low/high earnings in this setting. We recorded 2,676 workers performing 3.8 million tasks on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Our task-level analysis revealed that workers earned a median hourly wage of only ~$2/h, and only 4% earned more than $7.25/h. While the average requester pays more than $11/h, lower-paying requesters post much more work. Our wage calculations are influenced by how unpaid work is accounted for, e.g., time spent searching for tasks, working on tasks that are rejected, and working on tasks that are ultimately not submitted. We further explore the characteristics of tasks and working patterns that yield higher hourly wages. Our analysis informs platform design and worker tools to create a more positive future for crowd work.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
How Much Do Platform Workers Value Reviews? An Experimental Method
CHI '22· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 67%
Using Worker Self-Assessments for Competence-based Pre-Selection in Crowdsourcing Microtasks
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 67%
PledgeWork: Online Volunteering through Crowdwork
CHI '19· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 67%
HistoryTracker: Minimizing Human Interactions in Baseball Game Annotation
CHI '19· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 67%
Two Tools are Better Than One: Tool Diversity as a Means of Improving Aggregate Crowd Performance
IUI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 60%
Monotasking or Multitasking: Designing for Crowdworkers' Preferences
CHI '19· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)