PledgeWork: Online Volunteering through Crowdwork
Honorable MentionAuthors
In this paper, we explore an alternative form of volunteer work, PledgeWork, where individuals, rather than working directly for a charity, make indirect donations by completing tasks provided by a third party task provider. PledgeWork poses novel research questions on issues of user acceptance of on-line volunteerism, on quality and quantity of work performed as a volunteer, and on the benefits low-barrier volunteerism might provide to charities. To evaluate these questions, we conduct a mixed methods study that compares the quality and quantity of work between volunteer workers and paid workers and user attitudes toward PledgeWork, including perceived benefits and drawbacks. We find that PledgeWork can improve the quality of simple tasks and that the vast majority of our participants expressed interest in using our PledgeWork platform to contribute to a charity. Our interview also reveals current problems with volunteering and online donations, thus highlighting additional strengths of PledgeWork.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Using Worker Self-Assessments for Competence-based Pre-Selection in Crowdsourcing Microtasks
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 100%
HistoryTracker: Minimizing Human Interactions in Baseball Game Annotation
CHI '19· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 100%
Two Tools are Better Than One: Tool Diversity as a Means of Improving Aggregate Crowd Performance
IUI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 67%
A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 67%
Running Out of Time: The Impact and Value of Flexibility in On-Demand Crowdwork
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 67%
Bolt: Instantaneous Crowdsourcing via Just-in-Time Training
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 67%
Online Sequencing of Non-Decomposable Macrotasks in Expert Crowdsourcing
CHI '18· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 67%
Understanding and Mitigating Worker Biases in the Crowdsourced Collection of Subjective Judgments
CHI '19· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 67%
Creativity on Paid Crowdsourcing Platforms
CHI '20· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 67%
Crowdsourcing in China: Exploring the Work Experiences of Solo Crowdworkers and Crowdfarm Workers
CHI '20· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)