Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit

Inclusive DesignEmpowerment of Marginalized GroupsParticipatory DesignDesign FictionHCI ResearchersSociologists & Anthropologists

Document Title

Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit

Document Information

  • Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Participatory Design, Speculative Design, and Racial Politics
  • Keywords: Design methods, design research methods, participatory design, qualitative methods, Afrofuturism, community design, toolkit, HCI, speculative design, race and design

Research Background and Issues

  1. Identified Problems or Challenges:

    • Co-design methods still face issues of power imbalance in promoting democratized design, particularly in collaborations with historically marginalized communities.
    • Traditional design tools often fail to effectively address complex social issues related to race and identity.
    • Current speculative design practices lack sufficient focus on the futures of Black and Brown communities.
  2. Importance of the Issues:

    • Ignoring social contexts in design may inadvertently reinforce existing social hierarchies or perpetuate racial biases, causing further harm to marginalized communities.
    • Ensuring equitable design and the participation of marginalized populations is critical in the HCI field.
  3. Research Motivation and Related Work:

    • The authors explore how racial politics influence design methods and propose that design should intentionally support historically oppressed groups.
    • Afrofuturism provides a design lens to reimagine more inclusive futures.
    • Community-driven design practices and toolkits (e.g., design probes) have proven significant in exploring social complexities and fostering culturally adaptive design processes.

Solution

  1. Proposed Methods or Solutions:

    • The authors developed the "Building Utopias" toolkit, a speculative design tool centered on Afrofuturism, utilizing card decks and workbooks to support community-driven design exercises.
    • The toolkit emphasizes joy, liberation, and community building, encouraging participants to reimagine equitable futures rooted in historical racial inequalities.
  2. Innovative Aspects:

    • Positioning Afrofuturism as the core of design probes to address critiques of existing design research's lack of attention to Black futurism.
    • Providing open-ended card prompts and tools to empower community design practices with greater autonomy, reducing reliance on researchers.
    • The toolkit's flexibility allows users to adapt its use to their specific goals, offering cultural adaptability for community design.
  3. Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:

    • Development Phase:
      • Conducted four brainstorming sessions with community design practitioners to explore themes of liberation and futures, refining card content.
      • Card focus areas include time forecasting, existing issues (e.g., cultural bias, environmental racism), methods of liberation, and solution ideation.
    • Testing Phase:
      • Interviewed 27 community design practitioners to evaluate the toolkit's cultural relevance, applicability, and design quality.
    • Analysis Steps: Recorded and coded interview content to extract practitioners' feedback and suggestions on the toolkit.

Research Outcomes

  1. Specific Outcomes:

    • The toolkit was recognized as a flexible and culturally relevant resource for personal reflection, community design discussions, or institutional racial awareness education.
    • The study highlighted the potential of Afrofuturist design toolkits to spark dialogues on racial issues, complementing existing tools.
  2. Comparative Advantages Over Existing Solutions:

    • Expands traditional participatory design frameworks by introducing Afrofuturism, integrating race, diversity, and future visions into the design process.
    • Embeds more inclusive language in the toolkit, reducing reliance on design jargon to enhance accessibility for communities.
    • Emphasizes community leadership and toolkit flexibility, enabling effective use even by non-professional designers.
  3. Experimental or Evaluation Results:

    • Participants in the interviews acknowledged the toolkit's forward-thinking design, particularly praising the Liberation card set for its profound impact.
    • Many participants noted the toolkit's potential in fostering equitable and diverse design dialogues, excelling in initiating conversations and constructing design visions.
  4. Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Limitations:
      • Some design practitioners expressed concerns that the toolkit's future orientation might disconnect from the immediate needs of current communities.
      • Challenges remain in expanding the toolkit's target audience (e.g., non-Black communities or cross-cultural groups).
    • Future Directions:
      • Develop clearer usage guidelines for the toolkit to provide effective user support.
      • Enhance the toolkit's applicability in facilitating cross-cultural dialogue and interaction.
      • Explore ways to strengthen the toolkit's support for immediate community development actions while maintaining its future-oriented flexibility.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/68849/2022

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3491102.3501945
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2022
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Inclusive Design, Empowerment of Marginalized Groups, Participatory Design, Design Fiction
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Sociologists & Anthropologists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
2 related papers