Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit
Authors
Inclusive DesignEmpowerment of Marginalized GroupsParticipatory DesignDesign FictionHCI ResearchersSociologists & Anthropologists
Document Title
Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit
Document Information
- Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Participatory Design, Speculative Design, and Racial Politics
- Keywords: Design methods, design research methods, participatory design, qualitative methods, Afrofuturism, community design, toolkit, HCI, speculative design, race and design
Research Background and Issues
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Co-design methods still face issues of power imbalance in promoting democratized design, particularly in collaborations with historically marginalized communities.
- Traditional design tools often fail to effectively address complex social issues related to race and identity.
- Current speculative design practices lack sufficient focus on the futures of Black and Brown communities.
-
Importance of the Issues:
- Ignoring social contexts in design may inadvertently reinforce existing social hierarchies or perpetuate racial biases, causing further harm to marginalized communities.
- Ensuring equitable design and the participation of marginalized populations is critical in the HCI field.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- The authors explore how racial politics influence design methods and propose that design should intentionally support historically oppressed groups.
- Afrofuturism provides a design lens to reimagine more inclusive futures.
- Community-driven design practices and toolkits (e.g., design probes) have proven significant in exploring social complexities and fostering culturally adaptive design processes.
Solution
-
Proposed Methods or Solutions:
- The authors developed the "Building Utopias" toolkit, a speculative design tool centered on Afrofuturism, utilizing card decks and workbooks to support community-driven design exercises.
- The toolkit emphasizes joy, liberation, and community building, encouraging participants to reimagine equitable futures rooted in historical racial inequalities.
-
Innovative Aspects:
- Positioning Afrofuturism as the core of design probes to address critiques of existing design research's lack of attention to Black futurism.
- Providing open-ended card prompts and tools to empower community design practices with greater autonomy, reducing reliance on researchers.
- The toolkit's flexibility allows users to adapt its use to their specific goals, offering cultural adaptability for community design.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Development Phase:
- Conducted four brainstorming sessions with community design practitioners to explore themes of liberation and futures, refining card content.
- Card focus areas include time forecasting, existing issues (e.g., cultural bias, environmental racism), methods of liberation, and solution ideation.
- Testing Phase:
- Interviewed 27 community design practitioners to evaluate the toolkit's cultural relevance, applicability, and design quality.
- Analysis Steps: Recorded and coded interview content to extract practitioners' feedback and suggestions on the toolkit.
- Development Phase:
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Outcomes:
- The toolkit was recognized as a flexible and culturally relevant resource for personal reflection, community design discussions, or institutional racial awareness education.
- The study highlighted the potential of Afrofuturist design toolkits to spark dialogues on racial issues, complementing existing tools.
-
Comparative Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Expands traditional participatory design frameworks by introducing Afrofuturism, integrating race, diversity, and future visions into the design process.
- Embeds more inclusive language in the toolkit, reducing reliance on design jargon to enhance accessibility for communities.
- Emphasizes community leadership and toolkit flexibility, enabling effective use even by non-professional designers.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Participants in the interviews acknowledged the toolkit's forward-thinking design, particularly praising the Liberation card set for its profound impact.
- Many participants noted the toolkit's potential in fostering equitable and diverse design dialogues, excelling in initiating conversations and constructing design visions.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Some design practitioners expressed concerns that the toolkit's future orientation might disconnect from the immediate needs of current communities.
- Challenges remain in expanding the toolkit's target audience (e.g., non-Black communities or cross-cultural groups).
- Future Directions:
- Develop clearer usage guidelines for the toolkit to provide effective user support.
- Enhance the toolkit's applicability in facilitating cross-cultural dialogue and interaction.
- Explore ways to strengthen the toolkit's support for immediate community development actions while maintaining its future-oriented flexibility.
- Limitations:
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can Afrofuturist design tools support community-led design dialogues?Category: Indigenous, Decolonial, and Afro/Indigenous Futurist DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can current co-design methods achieve more inclusive design visions by incorporating Afrofuturism?Category: Indigenous, Decolonial, and Afro/Indigenous Futurist DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can power imbalances in design methods be reduced to better serve marginalized communities?Category: Indigenous, Decolonial, and Afro/Indigenous Futurist DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Traditional design tools fail to effectively address complex social issues related to race and identity.Category: Indigenous, Decolonial, and Afro/Indigenous Futurist DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Effects of Socially Stigmatized Crowdfunding Campaigns in Shaping Opinions
CHI '18· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 63%
Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design
CHI '21· Gender & Race Issues in HCI +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3491102.3501945
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2022
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Inclusive Design, Empowerment of Marginalized Groups, Participatory Design, Design Fiction
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Sociologists & Anthropologists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
2 related papers