UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review of the ACM Digital Library
Authors
Title of the Paper
UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review of the ACM Digital Library
Paper Information
- Field of Study: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), User Experience (UX), Conversational AI
- Keywords: Conversational agents, chatbots, conversational AI, user experience research, literature review
Research Background and Questions
- Background: Conversational agents (CAs), such as chatbots, are rapidly evolving. Initially, they primarily supported dyadic (one-on-one) human-computer interaction. Recently, there has been a growing trend toward supporting polyadic interactions, enabling both human-computer and interpersonal interactions simultaneously. However, research on the design and evaluation of multi-user conversational agents, particularly their role in interpersonal interactions, remains scattered across various fields and lacks systematic synthesis.
- Research Questions:
- How do multi-user conversational agents address challenges in interpersonal interactions?
- What are the differences between research on dyadic and multi-user conversational agents?
- What are the best practices for designing multi-user conversational agents?
- What impact do these agents have on interpersonal interactions?
- What metrics are used to evaluate the user experience of multi-user conversational agents?
- What issues are overlooked in design research?
- Significance: Addressing the design and ethical challenges of multi-user conversational agents in interpersonal interactions is crucial for enhancing user experience and fostering innovation in applications.
Solutions
-
Research Methods and Steps:
- Conducted a systematic review of the ACM Digital Library, screening 1,302 articles and ultimately identifying 36 studies on multi-user conversational agents and 135 studies on dyadic interactions.
- Employed a mixed-methods analysis combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, including topic modeling and open coding.
-
Innovations:
- Systematically summarized the key challenges that multi-user conversational agents can address in interpersonal interactions.
- Proposed a comprehensive set of metrics for evaluating user experience.
- Explored the social boundary issues in the design of multi-user conversational agents.
-
Implementation Steps and Techniques:
- Data Collection: Filtered articles from the ACM database using inclusion/exclusion criteria, such as whether user experience evaluation was included and whether the study addressed multilingual contexts.
- Qualitative Analysis: Used thematic analysis to define the unique designs and practices of multi-user interactions.
- Quantitative Analysis: Applied topic modeling tools to uncover popular themes in research on multi-user and dyadic conversational agents.
Research Findings
-
Challenges Addressed by Multi-User Conversational Agents:
- Communication Efficiency: Mitigating issues such as disorganized communication structures and task management difficulties in collaboration.
- Lack of Engagement: Encouraging group members to participate more equally and effectively.
- Relationship Maintenance: Assisting teams in managing emotions, building trust, and preventing conflicts.
- Building Connections: Facilitating cross-cultural "ice-breaking" conversations and initial relationship building.
-
Differences in Research Focus:
- Studies on dyadic agents focus more on the quality of individual interactions with AI.
- Research on multi-user agents emphasizes improving interpersonal collaboration in scenarios such as team discussions, education, and online communities.
-
Common Design and Evaluation Methods:
- Design Methods: Most studies adopt framework-driven or user-participatory design approaches.
- Common Metrics: Include task completion time, user engagement, perceived social support, and conversational fluency.
- Evaluation Methods: Employ experiments, surveys, interviews, and log analysis. In multi-user scenarios, social behaviors and emotional dynamics are particularly considered.
-
Unaddressed Issues in Systematic Research:
- Multi-user conversational agents require clear "visibility" and "ignorable" design considerations.
- "Boundary-awareness" should be embedded in agent design to address the complex relationships between privacy, ethics, and social dynamics.
- Existing theories are rarely applied to the design of multi-user agents. Future research should integrate theories from sociology and psychology.
-
Comparative Advantages Over Existing Solutions: This review is the first to systematically explore the role of multi-user conversational agents in user experience and social relationships, providing a robust theoretical foundation and practical recommendations for future design.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The study is limited to the ACM database, with insufficient coverage of research from other sources.
- Further exploration of innovative agent designs and real-world experimental evaluations is needed.
- Future research should delve deeper into the ethical and social impacts of boundary-aware agents and address new dimensions of complexity in multi-user interaction scenarios.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do multi-user conversational agents address challenges in interpersonal interaction?Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How does research on dual-user conversational agents differ from multi-user conversational agents?Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What are the best practices for designing multi-user conversational agents?Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Team collaboration suffers from low communication efficiency and unequal interaction.Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughts
CHI '25· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 100%
Chatbots With Attitude: Enhancing Chatbot Interactions Through Dynamic Personality Infusion
CUI '24· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 100%
How Dynamic vs. Static Presentation Shapes User Perception and Emotional Connection to Text-Based AI
IUI '25· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 67%
Touch Your Heart: A Tone-aware Chatbot for Customer Care on Social Media
CHI '18· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Single or Multiple Conversational Agents? An Interactional Coherence Comparison
CHI '18· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents
CHI '19· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
If I Hear You Correctly: Building and Evaluating Interview Chatbots with Active Listening Skills
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Bot in the Bunch: Facilitating Group Chat Discussion by Improving Efficiency and Participation with a Chatbot
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Effects of Persuasive Dialogues: Testing Bot Identities and Inquiry Strategies
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
"I Hear You, I Feel You": Encouraging Deep Self-disclosure through a Chatbot
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)