How Dynamic vs. Static Presentation Shapes User Perception and Emotional Connection to Text-Based AI
Authors
This study investigates the influence of dynamic versus static presentation modes in text-based conversational AI on user perceptions and emotional connection. We conducted a controlled, within-subjects experiment (N=103) where non-technical users interacted with a LLM-powered chatbot in both dynamic (typing-simulation display) and static (non-incremental text display) modes. Results from ANOVA showed that dynamic interactions improved perceptions of AI's competence, warmth, trustworthiness, engagement, adaptive behavior, supportiveness, personal connection, empathy, bias awareness, accountability, and emotional expressiveness. However, no significant differences were found in perceived effectiveness, bias, and learning support. These findings indicate that dynamic AI presentations can significantly enhance user experience by fostering deeper emotional connections and greater trust in the system, making AI interactions more human-like and increasing adoption of AI technologies. The paper discusses implications for human-AI interface design, emphasizing the need to mitigate risks of misinformation and manipulation of users through transparency, ethical considerations, and robust user education strategies.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review of the ACM Digital Library
CHI '22· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 100%
Proactive Conversational Agents with Inner Thoughts
CHI '25· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 100%
Chatbots With Attitude: Enhancing Chatbot Interactions Through Dynamic Personality Infusion
CUI '24· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 67%
Touch Your Heart: A Tone-aware Chatbot for Customer Care on Social Media
CHI '18· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Single or Multiple Conversational Agents? An Interactional Coherence Comparison
CHI '18· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents
CHI '19· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
If I Hear You Correctly: Building and Evaluating Interview Chatbots with Active Listening Skills
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Bot in the Bunch: Facilitating Group Chat Discussion by Improving Efficiency and Participation with a Chatbot
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Effects of Persuasive Dialogues: Testing Bot Identities and Inquiry Strategies
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
"I Hear You, I Feel You": Encouraging Deep Self-disclosure through a Chatbot
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)