An Adaptive Model of Gaze-based Selection
Authors
Eye Tracking & Gaze InteractionHuman Pose & Activity Recognition
Title of the Paper
An Adaptive Model of Gaze-based Selection
Paper Information
- Field of Study: Human-Computer Interaction and Eye-Tracking Technology
- Keywords: Reinforcement Learning, Gaze-based Selection, Adaptive Model, Computational Rationality, Eye Movement Control, Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP)
Research Background and Problem
- Problem or Challenge:
- Research on the performance of gaze-based selection (an input method based on eye movement control) has shown inconsistent results, particularly when compared to other input methods such as mouse and head pointing.
- Existing models focus on motor constraints while neglecting the impact of visual constraints on gaze-based selection.
- There is a lack of clear mechanisms and theoretical models to understand the complex eye movement sequences and selection strategies involved in gaze-based selection.
- Significance:
- Gaze-based selection enables faster, more intuitive, and hands-free human-computer interaction. Understanding its mechanisms can help optimize its application in virtual/augmented reality.
- Developing more accurate cognitive and computational models is crucial for improving gaze-based interaction technologies and their design.
- Motivation and Related Work:
- By modeling eye movement sequences and gaze-based selection mechanisms, this study explores how visual and motor system constraints influence strategy decisions.
- This research aims to use a reinforcement learning-based model to better match human experimental results, surpassing traditional models that rely solely on empirical data fitting.
Solution
- Proposed Method or Solution:
- A gaze-based selection model based on a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) is proposed.
- Reinforcement learning algorithms are used to optimize policies, enabling the model to achieve "bounded optimality" under the constraints of visual and motor systems.
- Key assumption: Gaze-based selection is a strategy to optimize utility functions (e.g., selection time and accuracy) constrained by the properties of the visual and motor systems.
- Innovations:
- Provides a mathematical framework capable of predicting gaze-based selection behavior, effectively simulating human gaze control strategies through reinforcement learning.
- The model predicts not only the total task completion time but also simulates each step of eye movement control.
- Unlike traditional models, it does not rely on extensive human data for training but adapts through trial-and-error learning in an artificial environment.
- Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Model the gaze-based selection task as a POMDP problem, defining states, actions, observations, reward functions, and transition functions.
- Simulate the visual and motor noise characteristics of eye movements: define signal-dependent noise in eye movements, uncertainty in visual position, and gaze drift.
- Use a deep reinforcement learning algorithm (Proximal Policy Optimization, PPO) to solve the POMDP and train the model.
- Compare model results with experimental data (e.g., human gaze-based selection experiments from Schuetz 2019 and Zhang 2010).
Research Outcomes
- Specific Outcomes:
- The model successfully predicts five key behavioral phenomena consistent with experimental results, including the relationships between target size and selection time, dwell time, and the number of eye movements.
- The model demonstrates that smaller targets require more corrective saccades to complete the selection task and accurately calculates eye movement strategies under different target conditions.
- Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:
- Provides a deeper cognitive understanding of gaze-based selection mechanisms, capable of explaining complex eye movement behaviors that existing models cannot describe.
- Allows for model parameter calibration at a single experimental point without fitting the entire dataset.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- The model's predictions for target selection time align with experimental results, with a root mean square error (RMSE) within a reasonable range: for instance, achieving an overall accuracy of 54.5 milliseconds for Zhang 2010.
- Experimental validation shows the model's adaptability, indicating that as target distance and size increase, the dominant factor for selection time is the number of corrective saccades.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- The model slightly overestimates gaze behavior for smaller targets (<1°), likely due to the precision limitations of eye-tracking devices not fully accounted for.
- The current model assumes a fixed range of gaze drift; future work could consider making the drift range adaptive to target size.
- Potential directions include extending the model to adapt to visual biases (e.g., target estimation biases based on the current gaze point) and incorporating more dynamic scene experiments for validation.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How do visual and motor system constraints affect strategic decisions in gaze-based selection?Category: XR Eye Tracking and Gaze InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can human gaze-selection behavior be modeled using reinforcement learning and partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs)?Category: XR Eye Tracking and Gaze InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do target size, distance, and other factors affect gaze-selection time and eye-movement strategy?Category: XR Eye Tracking and Gaze InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Users experience insufficient efficiency and accuracy when using gaze-based selection in VR and AR.Category: XR Eye Tracking and Gaze InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Vergence Matching: Inferring Attention to Objects in 3D Environments for Gaze-Assisted Selection
CHI '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Classifying Head Movements to Separate Head-Gaze and Head Gestures as Distinct Modes of Input
CHI '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Comparing Dwell time, Pursuits and Gaze Gestures for Gaze Interaction on Handheld Mobile Devices
CHI '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Looking but Not Focusing: Defining Gaze-Based Indices of Attention Lapses and Classifying Attentional States
CHI '25· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
Detecting low rapport during natural interactions in small groups from non-verbal behavior
IUI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 100%
SUPREYES: SUPer Resolutin for EYES Using Implicit Neural Representation Learning
UIST '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Your Eyes Tell: Leveraging Smooth Pursuit for Assessing Cognitive Workload
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
- 67%
Faces of Focus: A Study on the Facial Cues of Attentional States
CHI '20· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Kinetic Signatures: A Systematic Investigation of Movement-Based User Identification in Virtual Reality
CHI '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445177
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction, Human Pose & Activity Recognition
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
9 related papers