Self-Interruptions of Non-Driving Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles: Mobile vs Head-Up Display

Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)Motion Sickness & Passenger ExperienceAutomotive Manufacturers & Vehicle DesignersAutonomous Driving Engineers & Test Drivers

Automated driving raises new human factors challenges. There is a paradox that allows drivers to perform non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), while benefiting from a driver who regularly attends to the driving task. Systems that aim to better manage a driver's attention, encouraging task switching and interleaving, may help address this paradox. However, a better understanding of how drivers self-interrupt while engaging in NDRTs is required to inform such systems. This paper presents a counterbalanced within-subject simulator study with N=42 participants experiencing automated driving in a familiar driving environment. Participants chose a TV show to watch on a HUD and mobile display during two 15min drives on the same route. Eye and head tracking data revealed more self-interruptions in the HUD condition, suggesting a higher likelihood of a higher situation awareness. Our results may benefit the design of future attention management systems by informing the visual and temporal integration of the driving and non-driving related task.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/32582/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376751
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), Motion Sickness & Passenger Experience
work
Professions
Automotive Manufacturers & Vehicle Designers, Autonomous Driving Engineers & Test Drivers
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers