Effects of Cognitive Distraction and Driving Environment Complexity on Adaptive Cruise Control Use and Its Impact on Driving Performance: A Simulator Study
Authors
As driving automation features are increasingly integrated into vehicles to enhance safety and comfort, new risks and challenges emerge in the transition towards full automation. Here, we adopt a human-centered approach to explore whether and how drivers’ cognitive state and driving environment complexity influence reliance on driving automation features. Besides, we examine whether such reliance affects driving performance. Participants operated a vehicle equipped with adaptive cruise control (ACC) in a simulator across six predefined driving scenarios. In each scenario, they were either engaged in a cognitively demanding task (i.e., responding to mental calculations) or not (cognitive distraction, 2 levels), while experiencing different traffic conditions (driving environment complexity, 3 levels). Throughout the experiment, participants had to respect speed limits and were free to activate or deactivate ACC. In complex driving environments, we found that more frequent ACC activations and deactivations occurred and that the overall ACC engagement time was lower compared to less complex driving environments. We observed no significant effect of cognitive load on ACC use. Furthermore, while ACC use had no effect on the number of lane changes, it did impact the speed limits compliance.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Little Road Driving HUD: Heads-Up Display Complexity Influences Drivers’ Perceptions of Automated Vehicles
CHI '21· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 100%
Evaluating Head-Up Displays across Windshield Locations
AutoUI '19· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 100%
Effects of Focal Plane Distance on Perceptual Distance Matching with an Automotive AR-HUD
AutoUI '23· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 100%
Exploring Urban Challenges: Understanding Advanced Driver Assistance Systems in Different Situational Contexts
AutoUI '24· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 100%
Unraveling Subjective ADAS Comprehension Considering Factors of Situational Complexity on the Example of Traffic Light Scenarios
AutoUI '25· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 100%
Measuring Driver Electrodermal Activity when Exposed to HMIs Conveying Uncertainty in Conditional Automated Driving
AutoUI '25· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 100%
Drivers’ Attention to Dash-Based Human-Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Partial Automation and Cognitive Load
AutoUI '25· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
- 75%
Chase Lights in the Peripheral View: How the Design of Moving Patterns on an LED Strip Influences the Perception of Speed in an Automotive Context
CHI '20· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 75%
Self-Interruptions of Non-Driving Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles: Mobile vs Head-Up Display
CHI '20· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 75%
Effects of Semantic Segmentation Visualization on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated Vehicles
CHI '21· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)