Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based Systems

Honorable Mention
Content Moderation & Platform GovernanceAlgorithmic Fairness & BiasInclusive DesignParticipatory DesignHCI Researchers

On Wikipedia, sophisticated algorithmic tools are used to assess the quality of edits and take corrective actions. However, algorithms can fail to solve the problems they were designed for if they conflict with the values of communities who use them. In this study, we take a Value-Sensitive Algorithm Design approach to understanding a community-created and -maintained machine learning-based algorithm called the Objective Revision Evaluation System (ORES)---a quality prediction system used in numerous Wikipedia applications and contexts. Five major values converged across stakeholder groups that ORES (and its dependent applications) should: (1) reduce the effort of community maintenance, (2) maintain human judgement as the final authority, (3) support differing peoples' differing workflows, (4) encourage positive engagement with diverse editor groups, and (5) establish trustworthiness of people and algorithms within the community. We reveal tensions between these values and discuss implications for future research to improve algorithms like ORES.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/32439/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376783
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Content Moderation & Platform Governance, Algorithmic Fairness & Bias, Inclusive Design, Participatory Design
work
Professions
HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers