A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms used within the U.S. Child Welfare System

Honorable Mention
AI-Assisted Decision-Making & AutomationAI Ethics, Fairness & AccountabilityAlgorithmic Fairness & BiasSpecial Education TeachersSocial WorkersGovernment Officials & Civil Servants

The U.S. Child Welfare System (CWS) is charged with improving outcomes for foster youth; yet, they are overburdened and underfunded. To overcome this limitation, several states have turned towards algorithmic decision-making systems to reduce costs and determine better processes for improving CWS outcomes. Using a human-centered algorithmic design approach, we synthesize 50 peer-reviewed publications on computational systems used in CWS to assess how they were being developed, common characteristics of predictors used, as well as the target outcomes. We found that most of the literature has focused on risk assessment models but does not consider theoretical approaches (e.g., child-foster parent matching) nor the perspectives of caseworkers (e.g., case notes). Therefore, future algorithms should strive to be context-aware and theoretically robust by incorporating salient factors identified by past research. We provide the HCI community with research avenues for developing human-centered algorithms that redirect attention towards more equitable outcomes for CWS.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/32307/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376229
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation, AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability, Algorithmic Fairness & Bias
work
Professions
Special Education Teachers, Social Workers, Government Officials & Civil Servants
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers