Evaluating 'Prefer not to say' Around Sensitive Disclosures

Honorable Mention
Privacy by Design & User ControlPrivacy Perception & Decision-MakingPrivacy Policy MakersContent Governance & Platform Compliance TeamsHCI Researchers

As people's offline and online lives become increasingly entwined, the sensitivity of personal information disclosed online is increasing. Disclosures often occur through structured disclosure fields (e.g., drop-down lists). Prior research suggests these fields may limit privacy, with non-disclosing users being presumed to be hiding undesirable information. We investigated this around HIV status disclosure in online dating apps used by men who have sex with men. Our online study asked participants (N=183) to rate profiles where HIV status was either disclosed or undisclosed. We tested three designs for displaying undisclosed fields. Visibility of undisclosed fields had a significant effect on the way profiles were rated, and other profile information (e.g., ethnicity) could affect inferences that develop around undisclosed information. Our research highlights complexities around designing for non-disclosure and questions the voluntary nature of these fields. Further work is outlined to ensure disclosure control is appropriately implemented around online sensitive information disclosures.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/32024/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376150
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Privacy by Design & User Control, Privacy Perception & Decision-Making
work
Professions
Privacy Policy Makers, Content Governance & Platform Compliance Teams, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers