Patient Perspectives on AI-Driven Predictions of Schizophrenia Relapses: Understanding Concerns and Opportunities for Self-Care and Treatment
Authors
Title of the Paper
Patient Perspectives on AI-Driven Predictions of Schizophrenia Relapses: Understanding Concerns and Opportunities for Self-Care and Treatment
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Intersection of artificial intelligence and mental health, with a particular focus on patient feedback regarding schizophrenia relapse prediction
- Keywords: Artificial intelligence, mental health, schizophrenia relapse, patient perspectives, social media data, self-reflection, support systems, privacy, ethical issues, human-computer interaction
Research Background and Problem
- Identified Challenges: Current AI models for predicting schizophrenia relapses often rely on self-reported data, social media, or other sources. However, their practical effectiveness, patient perspectives, and ethical risks have not been thoroughly explored.
- Significance of the Research: Schizophrenia affects approximately 24 million people worldwide, with over 80% experiencing relapses that severely disrupt their quality of life. Early detection and intervention are critical to mitigating symptom deterioration.
- Motivation and Related Work: AI models have the potential to predict relapse signals in schizophrenia, utilizing data such as electronic health records, smartphone usage, or social media activity. However, there are significant gaps in aligning these models with patients' lived experiences and addressing ethical concerns, including privacy, data security, and potential harm to mental health. This paper aims to explore patient perspectives to address these gaps in existing AI research in mental health.
Proposed Solution
- Proposed Approach:
- Conduct a three-phase study: semi-structured interviews to gather patient feedback; prototype development based on feedback; and user data collection to evaluate the prototype.
- Design patient-friendly language in the prototype to replace terms like "relapse," allow users to view the raw social media data used by the AI, and facilitate dialogue with support systems.
- Innovative Aspects:
- Emphasis on "patient-human-AI" multi-relational interaction design.
- Propose that the role of AI models should extend beyond prediction to fostering effective communication between patients and support systems.
- Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Interview Phase: Recruit 28 patients through social media support groups for one-on-one interviews, using reflexive thematic analysis to extract key concerns.
- Prototype Development Phase:
- Modify language to avoid "triggering" terms such as "relapse" or "hospitalization."
- Add options for patients to share prediction results with their support systems.
- Display AI-analyzed social media posts to enhance transparency and reduce algorithmic distrust.
- Feedback Collection Phase: Use participants' actual social media data to simulate AI prediction processes and gather user feedback on prediction results and feature designs.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Findings:
- Identified a significant disconnect between patients' definitions of schizophrenia relapse and the clinical assumptions embedded in current AI models, which often overlook social or behavioral signals.
- Designed prototype models that not only focus on relapse prediction but also encourage collaboration between patients and support systems, enhancing self-management and self-reflection.
- Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Compared to traditional models, this approach is more aligned with patients' lived experiences and emphasizes transparency and ethical considerations.
- Developed interpretable prediction information displays, reducing patient anxiety.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Participants widely appreciated the feature of sharing prediction results with support systems, viewing it as a way to foster collaboration.
- The "review social media content" feature helped users gain self-insights into their mental state, which was perceived as a positive influence on mental health.
- Most participants indicated that even if the AI model could not perfectly predict relapses, the tools provided were still valuable for reminding them to stay connected with their support systems.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- The current study has a limited sample size and lacks diversity, focusing primarily on patients in the United States without encompassing all cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds.
- The effectiveness of the tool for patients with more severe symptoms requires further validation.
- Future research could explore direct collaboration between AI models and support systems and develop specialized technologies for patients lacking access to support systems.
Summary: This paper reexamines the feasibility of AI in mental health from the patient perspective and proposes patient-centered system designs to enhance autonomy and collaboration, ultimately advancing the practical application of AI in predicting and intervening in schizophrenia relapses.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do patients view the transparency and privacy of AI predictions of schizophrenia relapse?Category: Medical AI Trust, Clinical Decision Support, and Patient-Provider CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How large is the gap between patient-defined schizophrenia relapse and clinical assumptions in AI models?Category: Medical AI Trust, Clinical Decision Support, and Patient-Provider CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can patient-centered AI tool design enhance collaboration between self-management and support systems?Category: Medical AI Trust, Clinical Decision Support, and Patient-Provider CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Patients have trust and privacy concerns about AI predictions of schizophrenia relapse.Category: Medical AI Trust, Clinical Decision Support, and Patient-Provider CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
How Much Decision Power Should (A)I Have?: Investigating Patients’ Preferences Towards AI Autonomy in Healthcare Decision Making
CHI '24· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 67%
Fairness and Decision-making in Collaborative Shift Scheduling Systems
CHI '20· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
Get To The Point! Problem-Based Curated Data Views To Augment Care For Critically Ill Patients
CHI '22· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 67%
Assertiveness-based Agent Communication for a Personalized Medicine on Medical Imaging Diagnosis: Assertiveness-based BreastScreening-AI
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer Patients
CHI '24· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
AI-Supported Electrocardiogram Interpretation: The Effect of Support Presentation on Diagnostic Accuracy, Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Diagnosis Time
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
Balancing Efficiency and Empathy: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on AI-Supported Workflows for Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
Toward Patient-Centered AI Fact Labels: Leveraging Extrinsic Trust Cues
DIS '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 60%
Supporting Cognitive Reappraisal With Digital Technology: A Content Analysis and Scoping Review of Challenges, Interventions, and Future Directions
CHI '24· Mental Health Apps & Online Support Communities
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)